Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:17:16 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Shantur Rathore <i@shantur.com>
Cc:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: fix endpoint direction when inputs are more
 than outputs
Message-ID: <YUBajNSJCUePf1dv@kroah.com>
References: <20210906120836.4596-1-i@shantur.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210906120836.4596-1-i@shantur.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 01:08:34PM +0100, Shantur Rathore wrote:
> In RK3399 as per documentation (
> https://usermanual.wiki/Document/RockchipDeveloperGuidelinux44USB.31610806
> ), there are 7 Input Endpoints and 6 Output endpoints, in total 13
> endpoints.
> 
> Currently dwc3/gadget.c driver uses the number of endpoints
> available and starts setting them up with even endpoints as output
> endpoints and odd numbered as even endpoints. This leads to 7 Output
> endpoints and 6 input endpoints for RK3399.
> 
> If you try to create a composite gadget which uses all the input
> endpoints, one can see the issue. You just need to create functions to
> use up the last input ep and it would fail to create. No need to
> connect it to the host.
> This was confirmed when running a rockchip-linux bsp image.
> 
> [root@rockpro rock]# ls /sys/kernel/debug/usb/fe800000.usb/
> ep0in  ep0out  ep1in  ep1out  ep2in  ep2out  ep3in  ep3out  ep4in
> ep4out  ep5in  ep5out  ep6in  link_state  lsp_dump  mode  regdump
> testmode
> 
> Currently in linux mainline it is
> 
> [root@rockpro rock]# ls /sys/kernel/debug/usb/fe800000.usb/
> ep0in  ep0out  ep1in  ep1out  ep2in  ep2out  ep3in  ep3out  ep4in
> ep4out  ep5in  ep5out  ep6out  link_state  lsp_dump  mode  regdump
> testmode
> 
> ep6 being out instead of in as per the hardware spec.
> 
> Upon investigation of rockchip bsp kernel,
> https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/
> 
> The issue was clear, currently, dwc3/gadget driver doesn't take
> DWC3_NUM_IN_EPS into consideration while enumerating them.
> 
> The patch below fixes the issue and ep6 is correctly enumerated as input.
> ---
>  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c   |  1 +
>  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h   |  1 +
>  drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> index 01866dcb953b..279c9a97cb8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> @@ -555,6 +555,7 @@ static void dwc3_core_num_eps(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>  	struct dwc3_hwparams	*parms = &dwc->hwparams;
>  
>  	dwc->num_eps = DWC3_NUM_EPS(parms);
> +	dwc->num_in_eps = DWC3_NUM_IN_EPS(parms);
>  }
>  
>  static void dwc3_cache_hwparams(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
> index 5612bfdf37da..89a0998c618c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
> @@ -1227,6 +1227,7 @@ struct dwc3 {
>  	u8			speed;
>  
>  	u8			num_eps;
> +	u8			num_in_eps;
>  
>  	struct dwc3_hwparams	hwparams;
>  	struct debugfs_regset32	*regset;
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> index 804b50548163..d9d19dc0a29f 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> @@ -693,9 +693,11 @@ void dwc3_gadget_clear_tx_fifos(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>  
>  	dwc->last_fifo_depth = fifo_depth;
>  	/* Clear existing TXFIFO for all IN eps except ep0 */
> -	for (num = 3; num < min_t(int, dwc->num_eps, DWC3_ENDPOINTS_NUM);
> -	     num += 2) {
> +	for (num = 3; num < DWC3_ENDPOINTS_NUM; num += 2) {
>  		dep = dwc->eps[num];
> +
> +		if(!dep)
> +			continue;
>  		/* Don't change TXFRAMNUM on usb31 version */
>  		size = DWC3_IP_IS(DWC3) ? 0 :
>  			dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_GTXFIFOSIZ(num >> 1)) &
> @@ -2257,7 +2259,7 @@ static void dwc3_stop_active_transfers(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>  {
>  	u32 epnum;
>  
> -	for (epnum = 2; epnum < dwc->num_eps; epnum++) {
> +	for (epnum = 2; epnum < DWC3_ENDPOINTS_NUM; epnum++) {
>  		struct dwc3_ep *dep;
>  
>  		dep = dwc->eps[epnum];
> @@ -2960,10 +2962,9 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_init_out_endpoint(struct dwc3_ep *dep)
>  	return dwc3_alloc_trb_pool(dep);
>  }
>  
> -static int dwc3_gadget_init_endpoint(struct dwc3 *dwc, u8 epnum)
> +static int dwc3_gadget_init_endpoint(struct dwc3 *dwc, u8 epnum, bool direction)
>  {
>  	struct dwc3_ep			*dep;
> -	bool				direction = epnum & 1;
>  	int				ret;
>  	u8				num = epnum >> 1;
>  
> @@ -3011,21 +3012,30 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_init_endpoint(struct dwc3 *dwc, u8 epnum)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int dwc3_gadget_init_endpoints(struct dwc3 *dwc, u8 total)
> +static int dwc3_gadget_init_endpoints(struct dwc3 *dwc, u8 total, u8 num_in_eps)
>  {
> -	u8				epnum;
> +	u8				num;
> +	int				ret;
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dwc->gadget->ep_list);
>  
> -	for (epnum = 0; epnum < total; epnum++) {
> -		int			ret;
> +	/* init input endpoints as reported by hw */
> +        for (num = 0; num < num_in_eps; num++) {
>  
> -		ret = dwc3_gadget_init_endpoint(dwc, epnum);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -	}
> +                ret = dwc3_gadget_init_endpoint(dwc, (num << 1) + 1, 1);
> +                if (ret)
> +                        return ret;
> +        }
>  
> -	return 0;
> +        /* init rest endpoints as output endpoints */
> +        for (num = 0; num < total - num_in_eps; num++) {
> +
> +                ret = dwc3_gadget_init_endpoint(dwc, num << 1, 0);
> +                if (ret)
> +                        return ret;
> +        }
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void dwc3_gadget_free_endpoints(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> @@ -4282,7 +4292,7 @@ int dwc3_gadget_init(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>  	 * sure we're starting from a well known location.
>  	 */
>  
> -	ret = dwc3_gadget_init_endpoints(dwc, dwc->num_eps);
> +	ret = dwc3_gadget_init_endpoints(dwc, dwc->num_eps, dwc->num_in_eps);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err4;
>  
> -- 
> 2.33.0
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line.  Please read the
  kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches and resend it after
  adding that line.  Note, the line needs to be in the body of the
  email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the
  email signature.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot