Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:02:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:02:26 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:13840 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:02:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 19:02:21 +0100 (CET) From: Dave Jones To: Patrick Mochel Cc: James Simmons , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: New Power Managment code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Patrick Mochel wrote: > > There were some bits at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/people/mochel last time > > I looked. > That's where it is. The most recent drop is the -1115 patches. I meant /pub/linux/kernel/people/ of course, but I'm sure James was smart enough to figure that out 8) > The power management transitions live in the most recent ACPI code, which > you can get from Intel: Something I'm curious on wrt to this new work. Would it make sense for these callbacks to get called before/after APM suspend as well as ACPI ? (I'm thinking of older pre-ACPI compliant boxes). Saving state of devices etc seems a logical thing to do. regards, Dave. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/