Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 13:01:17 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
        linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.14 04/25] cxl/pci: Introduce
 cdevm_file_operations
Message-ID: <YUDVXV8egoZP05SF@sashalap>
References: <20210913223339.435347-1-sashal@kernel.org>
 <20210913223339.435347-4-sashal@kernel.org>
 <CAPcyv4i5OHv2wHTO1Pdjz+qzAAWEha-7HdDdt42VyO_FasLSEA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4i5OHv2wHTO1Pdjz+qzAAWEha-7HdDdt42VyO_FasLSEA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 08:42:04AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 3:33 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 9cc238c7a526dba9ee8c210fa2828886fc65db66 ]
>>
>> In preparation for moving cxl_memdev allocation to the core, introduce
>> cdevm_file_operations to coordinate file operations shutdown relative to
>> driver data release.
>>
>> The motivation for moving cxl_memdev allocation to the core (beyond
>> better file organization of sysfs attributes in core/ and drivers in
>> cxl/), is that device lifetime is longer than module lifetime. The cxl_pci
>> module should be free to come and go without needing to coordinate with
>> devices that need the text associated with cxl_memdev_release() to stay
>> resident. The move will fix a use after free bug when looping driver
>> load / unload with CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y.
>>
>> Another motivation for passing in file_operations to the core cxl_memdev
>> creation flow is to allow for alternate drivers, like unit test code, to
>> define their own ioctl backends.
>
>Hi Sasha,
>
>Please drop this. It's not a fix, it's just a reorganization for
>easing the addition of new features and capabilities.

I'll drop it, but just to satisfy my curiousity: the description says it
fixes a use-after-free bug in the existing code, is it not the case?

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha