Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210912025235.3514761-1-linux@roeck-us.net> <315e4a23990444f585a15d2e23a39b8f@AcuMS.aculab.com>
 <46f59bf8-f243-b65c-07b3-8ecbf7b410fa@roeck-us.net> <CAMo8BfLOhr8Gw9RbSM_pVhgokDcBZ3PgwQAG6sCxDBAm_rMy7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <a34cac4a-dc17-acf0-f24e-69c06217adb6@roeck-us.net>
In-Reply-To: <a34cac4a-dc17-acf0-f24e-69c06217adb6@roeck-us.net>
From:   Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:24:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMo8Bf+rFk_CJiUOdQC5yLuMT+y-awgS9MSx0g3-DqLXYEeX7w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtensa: Increase size of gcc stack frame check
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        "linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 7:02 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> I still don't think that those stack limit warnings (now errors)
> will ever get fixed. Which is the point I was trying to make,
> and your observation that the stack frames are really that large
> because of KASAN just makes that argument stronger.
>
> Other than that, it is not my call to make that to do with this
> patch. If you think that it is inappropriate, by all means
> reject it.

I like it, also for the reason that with KASAN enabled
kernel stack size on xtensa is 4 times bigger.

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max