Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp1060377pxb; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:30:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyRyfNApNCfnw3LykswS8SuchPYlRAbB3k+r32dRkm4CEJrGCTSuQFx2trxt5yVuW3R+OcV X-Received: by 2002:a02:3f25:: with SMTP id d37mr11240363jaa.148.1631658644473; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:30:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631658644; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Dzy+QYwAHoAWykiJS92m2edvB7Ga6Tfj3fbY9jlOnoQ8O/omBaEEPfVg+s8jODUzPf OfvutuMN4Cpy21MiRLN/eo7pQ0ZjaEjSMKIUK3fzg8G0B8hqO5rxDr/5DA1P4m/0VDwN X6oo1zk973kuZtXwdG2bxLAQyGfRLpkOvopPCkYhZwoVxrXWxu81wieW4N/aIBVsAIzd NmJYuNY97WFbVlVsoaFFdZ8ECO+PJxwc14R+RWUjKd2wmqym1fDDYqLR08J2210eOqF8 WfP59XXhClUsP/M81ljllQ2KBLW+gZPJklDqXaMCIAVEE4C8X7zzRZ2zYAhr9cMGoTPu daVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=OOGSJMiHA0GrsheLPjqZOApUIXPheFNmd6HaQBlmI6I=; b=JEBSypkmTY/W332Cmir0pCw0F4pgIZaCufXnS2Q2wkAJRvWrDL/1ffo7zZ3M+OkhG0 19R4jN6Qhxc74jk5/hOTB7K20qcmgq/Ph0vzqxZH1NjDGtRnddEyEkQa7kEx+mSW+k7c 6myuPfESiMCfGbo5Kmg0J3DM3qhohfp5dJ1qgSBEXwSon+47sG+HFjt/LS+r6pyxxsZ2 v2+by6s0aC/Q3YSgqm4cFfyno0i7jw3x3FObWhoy+l5KIJD1imFzLzVyQ2qE0DxGpIkn q0RsKbQSm1wMJOSkSa0JzNd0NzLzphS18plS2w2t92mIM+dmpuChbd7RXtCtEPyshfxq owIQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=NNcYyS7n; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s195si11482403ios.106.2021.09.14.15.30.31; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=NNcYyS7n; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235455AbhINWa0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:30:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38976 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235137AbhINWaZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:30:25 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69DDFC061574; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:29:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id bq5so1672201lfb.9; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:29:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OOGSJMiHA0GrsheLPjqZOApUIXPheFNmd6HaQBlmI6I=; b=NNcYyS7n3cxhdsmKNyNkWrRNCtdUVe+k005bVrKWPhkxeKYJGDY7JQItsGKP0R9ag7 OF+scHQFB5sD+jQDhuOe3nOtvvfvUuMtkvYC/bL7WEhlnv9VayfRoIia/JDeqdIvRpT0 nf+ouQMJ3XmxzytlJ82aHi5DVAbyQiCs8016ZBqVMJwDeSo/JNzCKUs8/Ky0shyBhgPO NJfelis94P6JIDsDFPz/m+mydSHi4sdw8ZvVGDTjn9ZFY5TPB/gikmi6MK0Ldf+XqdWj w2ymYG3Ykr64kMAOzTDhi15hF7mluus045/hquIPHuGz52xvc1+4LgfWCKBNeA0zhVpW 1UrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OOGSJMiHA0GrsheLPjqZOApUIXPheFNmd6HaQBlmI6I=; b=hW19RyCSQ8eeNXLf45HxW/7yUmKzkvcExNxYSzTogYPuUSg2fUKoVh5NJuqQSkafJx uKXJO3sMt8m+e4ooRNKUvvAS1Phwv7R9+XfsbpDSC83wUvHD8IN/wf4cUElOJvm4LugP pH44ISYEJZaJ7/w8H/uZ3PZrCESngZqI10E5hWwE1lvD865ycvW/QL9J1m8w204HiZJH 3tpNk1hzvQ9O2SruAYuXbKtABIWZDbjFTaRed24QVD5RAM770CmdpcO0Yi0gtjP79xD7 CLsQ+pKjszeGDC/Heha6Dz1aNV+aD8ZVqclEI9SdqUPjC+oYPUMw7QkKMym45yqoX3sB cYyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PTohr6hyrROPMLHVYql9baYYVYqwZn4htp1E3EZscO7cstRC5 DwRAnR71pOpp95ZxXQ4DQ5J9rewijclxhb1IkhIy4VM9hhQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3f91:: with SMTP id x17mr15108290lfa.518.1631658545482; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:29:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210904082330.14864-1-utkarshverma294@gmail.com> <87ee9qdft1.fsf@meer.lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <87ee9qdft1.fsf@meer.lwn.net> From: Dwaipayan Ray Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:58:54 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: checkpatch: Add SYMBOLIC_PERMS message To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Utkarsh Verma , Lukas Bulwahn , Joe Perches , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 2:40 AM Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > Dwaipayan Ray writes: > > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 1:53 PM Utkarsh Verma wrote: > >> > >> Add a new message type SYMBOLIC_PERMS under the 'Permissions' > >> subsection. Octal permission bits are easier to read and understand > >> instead of their symbolic macro names. > >> > >> Suggested-by: Lukas Bulwahn > >> Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Verma > >> Acked-by: Lukas Bulwahn > >> Reviewed-by: Lukas Bulwahn > >> --- > >> Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst | 11 +++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst > >> index f0956e9ea2d8..41037594ec24 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst > >> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst > >> @@ -957,6 +957,17 @@ Permissions > >> Permission bits should use 4 digit octal permissions (like 0700 or 0444). > >> Avoid using any other base like decimal. > >> > >> + **SYMBOLIC_PERMS** > >> + Permission bits in the octal form are more readable and easier to > >> + understand than their symbolic counterparts because many command-line > >> + tools use this notation only. Experienced kernel developers have been using > > > > Let's remove "only". > > > >> + this traditional Unix permission bits for decades and so they find it > > > > Maybe you meant "these" here. > > > > With these changes made, > > Acked-by: Dwaipayan Ray > > I took the liberty of apply the patch with those changes made. > Thanks Jonathan. Utkarsh, you can start working on your next patches after submitting, you don't have to wait for the existing patches to be first accepted. They will follow the same review -> changes -> review cycle until they are good for acceptance. Like lukas said, try preparing a batch of say 3 to 5 rules and let's review it and get it in. Thanks, Dwaipayan.