Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp490958pxb; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 06:46:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNTQoNbhfAL9rLeavqp0AFXsKoQiKZontRMmiFOVOC4UB4508zJB6pFs9q4HCZKPYxugaK X-Received: by 2002:a92:2a10:: with SMTP id r16mr37868ile.309.1631713608041; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 06:46:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631713608; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=J6MbpDsS2O7Lhj9RgwKyZxKVbdc/FHJjL/HJFs1KRUherFsJ2e6ZutE8PVURL4QX9A PskKftCF1Fv/Z15OEgHy/01f0O4Fp609tx2Y/Zr5eHiMVYNnD9nZHnqCZFUBMKjN/xzG jaowH2dvnbKairZ4uc6CjweiWn+89S4oXj2L1R7CtDI9hHI/wgfEKPs5NqEB3DC2LzWw 1vMa5vW+91b7Pq8FWTwGVYXPCOJCEO1SDoixiCaPebFIFuJ1RE9aOfLUv+VENU7vjq1Q LmE3c1G4lkBUDD9J3TM6eiOMED31pLQjANYamJGVI5J8CWqYjss596tb9ruG585MO2+y +png== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=KQ0mYvYlsjGpQ+d+66iJcJ88tpYkB2RTja2fxA1Q0NM=; b=wz1s3+E5py6qSj9EhFg4yDdThGgPSGy7bgvUxe30UAK1OkF2/JhY7gWUJ25Suf8KM4 LO/uHGG6qniHNTZYnQwPW8d3h5PNW/fezvGGYQf48tAn2gvZ+lZ7dHEbEOE2bNjBI55N o7X4cfg14MNwE/HgYPQwu8QJtn82NzaQQV1UXUcyE1Cu2YW8QnICzZq0psa3jFQeVz2s HodGtBXGc8lkKhoJ3RdTi3CDlIhE374LlXl1m3tXpnqsFIhcGC9BCj/g/g1Z23qEGiAr cMntK4aZ4W49nlMPLyhOC63eZqg6OXH46Udm3rZ+vo1n8z9aY7TOd4KTTL4S72HqmHIf xdtw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f17si8190457iow.57.2021.09.15.06.46.35; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 06:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234504AbhIONrH (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:47:07 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:59352 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233395AbhIONrG (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:47:06 -0400 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]:37058) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mQVEQ-001Gjm-C7; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:45:46 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95]:48038 helo=email.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mQVEO-00AL6P-AQ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:45:45 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Sasha Levin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Ohhoon Kwon , Ingo Molnar , "David S . Miller" , Christian Brauner , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210913223339.435347-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20210913223339.435347-19-sashal@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 08:45:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20210913223339.435347-19-sashal@kernel.org> (Sasha Levin's message of "Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:33:33 -0400") Message-ID: <87v932ar5q.fsf@disp2133> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1mQVEO-00AL6P-AQ;;;mid=<87v932ar5q.fsf@disp2133>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19qhAbvPIGFi9CV+a16T7+aUe76EzEZfR4= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Sasha Levin X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 508 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.07 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 10 (2.0%), b_tie_ro: 9 (1.7%), parse: 0.96 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 26 (5.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 2.4 (0.5%), tests_pri_-1000: 31 (6.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.35 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.12 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 96 (19.0%), check_bayes: 85 (16.7%), b_tokenize: 9 (1.7%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (1.6%), b_comp_prob: 2.4 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 62 (12.3%), b_finish: 0.96 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 328 (64.7%), check_dkim_signature: 0.62 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 13 (2.7%), poll_dns_idle: 0.54 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 7 (1.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.14 19/25] connector: send event on write to /proc/[pid]/comm X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sasha Levin writes: > From: Ohhoon Kwon > > [ Upstream commit c2f273ebd89a79ed87ef1025753343e327b99ac9 ] > > While comm change event via prctl has been reported to proc connector by > 'commit f786ecba4158 ("connector: add comm change event report to proc > connector")', connector listeners were missing comm changes by explicit > writes on /proc/[pid]/comm. > > Let explicit writes on /proc/[pid]/comm report to proc connector. This is a potential userspace ABI breakage? Why backport it? Especially if there is no one asking for the behavior change in userspace? Eric > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701133458epcms1p68e9eb9bd0eee8903ba26679a37d9d960@epcms1p6 > Signed-off-by: Ohhoon Kwon > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: David S. Miller > Cc: Christian Brauner > Cc: Eric W. Biederman > Cc: Alexey Dobriyan > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin > --- > fs/proc/base.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c > index e5b5f7709d48..533d5836eb9a 100644 > --- a/fs/proc/base.c > +++ b/fs/proc/base.c > @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include "internal.h" > #include "fd.h" > @@ -1674,8 +1675,10 @@ static ssize_t comm_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, > if (!p) > return -ESRCH; > > - if (same_thread_group(current, p)) > + if (same_thread_group(current, p)) { > set_task_comm(p, buffer); > + proc_comm_connector(p); > + } > else > count = -EINVAL;