Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp1008145pxb; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:38:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKiA2UKkNDoumJEz/YJrcBcnJ/YDH7HOx+fY8ugpnV9vv+jqZPbUCVXtZ6rbtRK1zcuDLh X-Received: by 2002:a6b:296:: with SMTP id 144mr2532779ioc.114.1631759924311; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:38:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631759924; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mzutNExVXD+akKExYyTnNpbUyxOAEg/ol/YKseqKPV/lxzMKCbIXyKOy6fpLDNahRH 1JxtCnA3JGB+8uFmSvSDUovvFb+ZBkFGPoO7nESUoAGRkwCRZaC9dVCuZdms5ErNGtmw gn7Px+ptYo0vIbu8w6Q4gHjOnShAnRKMHNiVO3Yn0r7ENRkB0TXrwLrsH88MqgALC8+W HeGawT3JqIlZNQpLyVv3C333zzER7xeJXCPQq0/BY7vt9RIB5UAxfQI8gpJWnPER1PaN lx9MKoqC9xGdKX0rxpDLu64P0Cus+qSGhOvmJEEKwM0s5VUYzFWxRpK0CsX58ytShc2H aeFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=PwN8adbOpXIp9HGdBUCnCvW1Tc8jY/nDZ+95FJFKNWA=; b=wDCj3IJpzafEE8Hp2DpDIoCNJyv3NffGqBMizBmZCQoidi6dY+XOrq2fl/oAgGq26e m8epAFiF0jyfGEYWVSfNixE8+i3ObQqkjnU3u7Shx18ZscBxOCevxRskBEm8p5UXv3rx COVhIzuZHGdKtHHiAPYAvFPH7kqjgrRxgc8WW8PNsxjFz1jV4QDy0eb/cOwh7lbgVznz YjeZ/fKpi0NH6pu1/ko5rSAy00waEw53FsZLR4mJwAbPTsACp8kK3GbrgVr3x0CiPBSI A2OJLnzOm/Jd6gkIyYaLE+ilxhfrEnGOYB4HwmhvVwareIQqQC7K/nXg20BGeafFRIVB xawQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k3si1567509ilh.76.2021.09.15.19.38.31; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:38:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233932AbhIPCjJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 22:39:09 -0400 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]:16217 "EHLO szxga08-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233865AbhIPCjI (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 22:39:08 -0400 Received: from dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4H91SG1llfz1DGlJ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:36:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500004.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.219) by dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:37:47 +0800 Received: from [10.174.177.91] (10.174.177.91) by dggpemm500004.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:37:47 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] irqdomain: fix overflow error To: Thomas Gleixner , CC: , References: <20210908014623.61357-1-cuibixuan@huawei.com> <87o88vcqvh.ffs@tglx> <4f614b66-ad85-7fa3-6e6e-2a672e8148e3@huawei.com> <87pmtab7no.ffs@tglx> From: Bixuan Cui Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:37:46 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87pmtab7no.ffs@tglx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.91] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggpemm500004.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.219) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/9/15 15:49, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Appropriate is not really a technical reason. Making the code consistent > is. Agree, I'll change the message. Thanks Bixuan Cui