Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp1216841pxb; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 02:25:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2W8mB0wh4fnuLonukbx16Tb39ltqHDMxB4U7wi+V0eHNjnoyh1BOZRfrZy6aPrnO0UCdP X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2642:: with SMTP id ar2mr5372532ejc.97.1631784352058; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 02:25:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631784352; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=x6fezz4WlVa0aIlZQ91vnh7k1/nD4F8wGmiHEuvq+bStK2iZZHxyYy9fGCNZQiYybr 72tZljst3QBCE4h0jP4xUZSU8Tkzx1w57A7VgwrmJ1HVRE3O5betCghXd5x3tV65e2sE OOu3XyCnwuhD9C2dManNKtN1cG7C/X/rK6APKyqMNIrfc+vvos+PcfdtEBXpHvO63rTY //73CpBGPEMpJrM7pfA/+iJilWn+tZXVQPUxEosTFkrjXSyZ70cv3ieVjv56BQrriaNc Mza9bmfRSpQMuIxnU+jJOZurxZerbvaRpYnrlHLZK+aokC7D4MoVBaxhog5rRBPmJqIk jodw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=MKDlTDiXs4LvMYbV+NMZo7tR6+TRExR1SjRMX/D15+g=; b=H92jsOmJbPKooGOI+4WwBc1VH3eE7mvR7WAL65KojkU9EDiGeO/Yg6oheeJjZ/7yfq nVucQ9DGifVShZ+eAe0lkeGNp3bX+6Xo8GvGjGF13+4a6slGF0KhtxDT+d+Ozo/UYvwm Zrj1tzUQVWbwIv91yKhJGU8kPVmsRcIRHcM80FMi8q1lifeb8dk6mmoGrPdUEhm8TQDT x0ee/gYZzxg0gRs92gu+1TXGngVv9UfJseJq6/G88GX7vI4+eKdVU27kmyPapncZb4ZD MthBjvEwEyOklhw6OymyBBV/8UhQIFP+u/DTKvl8Jac6ANfk7C/qS/ryVj1Gr2ZebOiY j6eg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p60si2983042edb.519.2021.09.16.02.25.27; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 02:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235585AbhIPJZ2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 05:25:28 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:19987 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235418AbhIPJZZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 05:25:25 -0400 Received: from dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4H9BPS6XCRzbmYH; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:19:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggema762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.204) by dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:24:03 +0800 Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggema762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:24:02 +0800 From: Yu Kuai To: , , , CC: , , , , Subject: [patch v8 2/7] nbd: make sure request completion won't concurrent Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:33:45 +0800 Message-ID: <20210916093350.1410403-3-yukuai3@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210916093350.1410403-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> References: <20210916093350.1410403-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggema762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.204) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org commit cddce0116058 ("nbd: Aovid double completion of a request") try to fix that nbd_clear_que() and recv_work() can complete a request concurrently. However, the problem still exists: t1 t2 t3 nbd_disconnect_and_put flush_workqueue recv_work blk_mq_complete_request blk_mq_complete_request_remote -> this is true WRITE_ONCE(rq->state, MQ_RQ_COMPLETE) blk_mq_raise_softirq blk_done_softirq blk_complete_reqs nbd_complete_rq blk_mq_end_request blk_mq_free_request WRITE_ONCE(rq->state, MQ_RQ_IDLE) nbd_clear_que blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter nbd_clear_req __blk_mq_free_request blk_mq_put_tag blk_mq_complete_request -> complete again There are three places where request can be completed in nbd: recv_work(), nbd_clear_que() and nbd_xmit_timeout(). Since they all hold cmd->lock before completing the request, it's easy to avoid the problem by setting and checking a cmd flag. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai Reviewed-by: Ming Lei --- drivers/block/nbd.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c index 23ded569e8d3..614c6ab2b8fe 100644 --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c @@ -406,7 +406,11 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nbd_xmit_timeout(struct request *req, if (!mutex_trylock(&cmd->lock)) return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER; - __clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags); + if (!__test_and_clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags)) { + mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock); + return BLK_EH_DONE; + } + if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&nbd->config_refs)) { cmd->status = BLK_STS_TIMEOUT; mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock); @@ -841,7 +845,10 @@ static bool nbd_clear_req(struct request *req, void *data, bool reserved) return true; mutex_lock(&cmd->lock); - __clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags); + if (!__test_and_clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags)) { + mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock); + return true; + } cmd->status = BLK_STS_IOERR; mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock); -- 2.31.1