Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp1373564pxb; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 06:15:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz20UuSfWHjKEe5ZFqJM+eeymogfc5b5noktnDge+blDhNXPUmkFTJu/6wb8li0ExGwLam9 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:34c6:: with SMTP id w6mr6362513edc.97.1631798121723; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 06:15:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631798121; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nGEBVTnJzx7IRyTQqF7yvT4OJ63Urdpc01NYFbk5O71xEvYihq78KGdfjCdvmfWPyb 1BHSPg93cMjv3JrJ+e7iTpp4N9ZYbJqG5nX+rImo15cGkzw+kbnhAAbhhfswmud0vmd3 D2HB9xR3YbPm6EJu8tFLu4vgCOi+6AIDH6hgrMHUE+GV5hKXT6O2/kf1H+XILqcXAHtZ kw34hlpt1UiWpyoZs4PRZZBdlGT3Ow/jiFTBTngNeV/ke9qnOHuwagM9RJMxYsUOlWhI R3lU7asY0hHD3tjuJRnpaTabrBeCNCtjVvM/WgzycNTM0+LLcLMymmO9DFWPfr6hur9B eD6w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=9Dfmbtok3Xn5pdxqMrBA2FligGTkiPSlKz5ypC896/0=; b=AlpiW9L2H/Z1LXXD2+bjzTZAV9RCayM4GAHmNMPttiysG3Q2peOQOuXYl5XGIMA4gL wpRkeFTDLYQJ3mgo+C9kxNEvBrwCZv4qU6ZXhwSPt6FpNOZMvPJY+5fGGiC5agg3PFoi /qATuL5zDdJxS73jYiAmPrEyoELBwMjc9aeOsdaGKtFefUA6jinouQ+RyVgQWIAvAUV6 LwFBlSIwk6jRJXAVdeEwZRBql6Wyi4VGKKAPWU1eJS2jkYD2Zovdzad6pG/fQU6eBO9Z V08n4hf8s7HnmxEk62K/mdcVnM9uk7El7othWUVsyjWuaZkeo7OU74Qia4ghm4pnST+A tBlQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l11si3587367eje.503.2021.09.16.06.14.49; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 06:15:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239959AbhIPNMB (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:12:01 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:9741 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239837AbhIPNMB (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:12:01 -0400 Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4H9HVS0xL6zW2Zm; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:09:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggema762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.204) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:10:38 +0800 Received: from [10.174.176.73] (10.174.176.73) by dggema762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:10:37 +0800 Subject: Re: [patch v8 7/7] nbd: fix uaf in nbd_handle_reply() To: Ming Lei CC: , , , , , , References: <20210916093350.1410403-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> <20210916093350.1410403-8-yukuai3@huawei.com> From: "yukuai (C)" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:10:37 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.176.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To dggema762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.204) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/09/16 20:58, Ming Lei wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 05:33:50PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: >> There is a problem that nbd_handle_reply() might access freed request: >> >> 1) At first, a normal io is submitted and completed with scheduler: >> >> internel_tag = blk_mq_get_tag -> get tag from sched_tags >> blk_mq_rq_ctx_init >> sched_tags->rq[internel_tag] = sched_tag->static_rq[internel_tag] >> ... >> blk_mq_get_driver_tag >> __blk_mq_get_driver_tag -> get tag from tags >> tags->rq[tag] = sched_tag->static_rq[internel_tag] >> >> So, both tags->rq[tag] and sched_tags->rq[internel_tag] are pointing >> to the request: sched_tags->static_rq[internal_tag]. Even if the >> io is finished. >> >> 2) nbd server send a reply with random tag directly: >> >> recv_work >> nbd_handle_reply >> blk_mq_tag_to_rq(tags, tag) >> rq = tags->rq[tag] >> >> 3) if the sched_tags->static_rq is freed: >> >> blk_mq_sched_free_requests >> blk_mq_free_rqs(q->tag_set, hctx->sched_tags, i) >> -> step 2) access rq before clearing rq mapping >> blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(set, tags, hctx_idx); >> __free_pages() -> rq is freed here >> >> 4) Then, nbd continue to use the freed request in nbd_handle_reply >> >> Fix the problem by get 'q_usage_counter' before blk_mq_tag_to_rq(), >> thus request is ensured not to be freed because 'q_usage_counter' is >> not zero. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai >> --- >> drivers/block/nbd.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c >> index 69dc5eac9ad3..b3a47fc6237f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c >> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c >> @@ -825,6 +825,7 @@ static void recv_work(struct work_struct *work) >> work); >> struct nbd_device *nbd = args->nbd; >> struct nbd_config *config = nbd->config; >> + struct request_queue *q = nbd->disk->queue; >> struct nbd_sock *nsock; >> struct nbd_cmd *cmd; >> struct request *rq; >> @@ -835,7 +836,20 @@ static void recv_work(struct work_struct *work) >> if (nbd_read_reply(nbd, args->index, &reply)) >> break; >> >> + /* >> + * Grab .q_usage_counter so request pool won't go away, then no >> + * request use-after-free is possible during nbd_handle_reply(). >> + * If queue is frozen, there won't be any inflight requests, we >> + * needn't to handle the incoming garbage message. >> + */ >> + if (!percpu_ref_tryget(&q->q_usage_counter)) { >> + dev_err(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk), "%s: no io inflight\n", >> + __func__); >> + break; >> + } >> + >> cmd = nbd_handle_reply(nbd, args->index, &reply); >> + percpu_ref_put(&q->q_usage_counter); >> if (IS_ERR(cmd)) >> break; > > The refcount needs to be grabbed when completing the request because > the request may be completed from other code path, then the request pool > will be freed from that code path when the request is referred. Hi, The request can't complete concurrently, thus put ref here is safe. There used to be a commet here that I tried to explain it... It's fine to me to move it behind anyway. Thanks, Kuai