Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 16:41:58 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc:     bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] ftrace: Add multi direct modify interface
Message-ID: <20210916164131.632aec22@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <YUOf0Wt3+2r9HH6A@krava>
References: <20210831095017.412311-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
        <20210831095017.412311-8-jolsa@kernel.org>
        <20210914174134.1d8fd944@oasis.local.home>
        <20210915174718.77acaf8b@gandalf.local.home>
        <YUOf0Wt3+2r9HH6A@krava>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:49:37 +0200
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:

> > I'm curious to what the use case is for the multi direct modify interface
> > is?  
> 
> when the trampoline is re-generated by adding or removing program,
> we have same functions to trace and new trampoline to attach
> 

Then it probably doesn't matter for the slight delay in synchronization.

-- Steve