Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp2043585pxb; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:21:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwExNDpMlTN/awpGAiKaDDXT6QPeBWGWxK0J3Qoi5VVmaZzPz3ID8UPSFY340LWXoQyASM X-Received: by 2002:a92:c8c7:: with SMTP id c7mr7179763ilq.62.1631863291668; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:21:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631863291; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EOJkqXAqc3y7ZHo9/ECOqL3d3X0GM6Dn1G9jiDP9k8G47EgPadSk+64W3zAr9Uk+hM 9xLoLRM710NnzdS1Ql+UWUk8/SW7xNtd8wFlKptANw3S2NrdiwncG5CwBWFyd0dBLNPX 4WP4dC3rS//4CIPi/uN8AXg70v+255UmUcwiRk4iKFwFuqKKq8Gwv6TXnL3W3k2ZDFjD t2p9M6Tywtk5M9InGa2VJF9+K5wCBaaRBQ47VpQ0Dc8M1eZXlwMVC9rkF3sOJpuCXf3g BeRoy1Zk7iriOmQ7ol4rOsFrexq1dumeJ89tJ1cHFOyU3Z7ncnC0Q8nUXJj3RsJy2FQy CMhg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=+uoRd7sICB9PTbOq5EWEwT9s8dxxMBDK5Hxzn1p0B2M=; b=WVZP8buHxc47dODbAYzeQi2iqfJ0KqRVUDC6i1Ms9nIoAagixPy98xsX7lMd4pNcer 0KlCUZ1i8EDoLCK4SExA42VT3JgG56XkOw2CxxGaffE22YxxmdpWAcR75JSnOaj0aF+4 u/ikn2lLHI0MBQxORimBm97t53DXj2pijMGNJ4xvs7UphsanlmfuUC1psrX2ufhyf6ua KNqx8VCFcICr+ZYbzzG5qfg10Wuc86lB+HJwKxYWbl7/gkcPS2mPUoItU1pukSe4Dh7a 9yvvnFOTE1xN1Mc+6otZlblCz1bo1++tjLQJ0DQGVotgjncrZuT2CcCi19wQURz0Rz0v 9jlw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=1EHh+jTM; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b=vtwgGlcj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l4si5068465ilt.139.2021.09.17.00.21.20; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=1EHh+jTM; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b=vtwgGlcj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241307AbhIPWyY (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:54:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50758 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241276AbhIPWyY (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:54:24 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A965C061574; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:53:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1631832780; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+uoRd7sICB9PTbOq5EWEwT9s8dxxMBDK5Hxzn1p0B2M=; b=1EHh+jTMSzgz8I5umosdei/hjB4deVd+HjIXpER0jj3a9UJvUTmYCG3sktt+mmgogjx4i5 5D+TvgjsSbkOi2gRWJ9m/L2PsSXPUDA0fNBCaeyAQa5oIj2aZ0g7IpYrWYv2xoW3jpCr8W aEJLiY9J4es14JJ3Fuu2PLS1+FTJ0bE2cZpBoUg9o8Wfp16oVUcyT6k2JW56IzITAd1Qss dQHpUZYX/miD+m+QAFEvKHKOuPh3ii1buJhETb4Jo0E4cAcKIm9FXERVj2dXTWlNHeyUHk iAw/eFYYzJOa1pzYeAEHGABTxJs2LapYK4cztyOfWpa2A2nA74K18B2uCKyc+Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1631832780; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+uoRd7sICB9PTbOq5EWEwT9s8dxxMBDK5Hxzn1p0B2M=; b=vtwgGlcj3bLHRjLYNI/SunfOnn6jEEhRquuMedQEImsrPfPUPG9QhrJlsPjoht0r0FiHu4 T9zSULifH9VCAfCg== To: Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "# 3.4.x" , Lukas Hannen Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.14 298/334] time: Handle negative seconds correctly in timespec64_to_ns() In-Reply-To: <874kak9moe.ffs@tglx> References: <20210913131113.390368911@linuxfoundation.org> <20210913131123.500712780@linuxfoundation.org> <874kak9moe.ffs@tglx> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:53:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87y27w875f.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 17 2021 at 00:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > I usually spend quite some time on tagging patches for stable and it's > annoying me that this patch got reverted while stuff which I explicitely > did not tag for stable got backported for whatever reason and completely > against the stable rules: > > 627ef5ae2df8 ("hrtimer: Avoid double reprogramming in __hrtimer_start_range_ns()") > > What the heck qualifies this to be backported? > > 1) It's hot of the press and just got merged in the 5.15-rc1 merge > window and is not tagged for stable > > 2) https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > > clearly states the rules but obviously our new fangled "AI" driven > approach to select patches for stable is blissfully ignorant of > these rules. I assume that AI stands for "Artifical Ignorance' here. > > I already got a private bug report vs. that on 5.10.65. Annoyingly > 5.10.5 does not have the issue despite the fact that the resulting diff 5.14.5 obviously... > between those two versions in hrtimer.c is just in comments. > > Bah! > > Thanks, > > tglx