Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp2069322pxb; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 01:09:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwpSFJInegmvtCP26e52DgHkcWFnc+9WzAUspsLNectMlK7jcfQH6zTDMR9fLhfnk7Xs2fV X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b4d3:: with SMTP id d202mr7611867iof.8.1631866149975; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 01:09:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631866149; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BJGBzMC0jYnZJmp2eeCsgwNptcyMdC7KMwY/kps41ToyFELVnj8+llm7Huk0qhyKT8 UHw+VzNvHOHGJ9EKi6oBwlIQ3zghoiYMvYuQrKOYMjtOByfpG8Y/a9kJn06oqMjuCjur GdkF7fGFTZhjFQG/sZpBNDwqWx027QxMr543OcD+cllR0TpbmyP2ThgpQPcOxG0EA/+B tE3HrRdP89d1ZyyOyFyfgb8+DN8b1dyHNIWuvjuF0GOjHT8jac+UgGXFovsPycWuWk/x tXcb/hYCd9jB6Faq295gmr3DGBzofCevxZbwwR1alCUSY9M3ul6RgiZ1rBezJkZpiSDT OTFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=hkgiQD2uTPPI0yn4q0R3suN/3C0WEfR93LIO5Kj/ozo=; b=spg17DlNQkbbExc6W7oEJ3VPAaB3oJNL0POCWDPDcVzowvX3EGiFj1MtoHCI5ICrlE ZN5jONw8LbwRPd3ahGPugWD0ykKe8QINZ3EUPMq4KVSmHIBWrS8D80dB0137aV1PGU3J T2zzpoM6cBIViAH4qPjsrM+U9VwcnbZN/bB8A5wo+RzJGl8SwyEjnUf3QBDrtcwNIHbG CAJXRYPmuUdjcU82Zf1TgpPwmmLOLateXN2wdR586zbjQRMOemrsADN36y5nLCeEq5G4 WwWq76dfWjHLnilKBWA4a+5+MMHLoJMdR1LUPDi4myX8BIiU4ADYesFxGBas5x1/2NXi 099w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b17si4665920ilc.122.2021.09.17.01.08.56; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 01:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243648AbhIPS4X (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 14:56:23 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:57492 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345117AbhIPS4E (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 14:56:04 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: tonyk) with ESMTPSA id E6F371F44239 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:54:32 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/20] futex: Implement sys_futex_waitv() Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, dvhart@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, Paul Eggert , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, kernel@collabora.com, krisman@collabora.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, Arnd Bergmann References: <20210915140710.596174479@infradead.org> <20210915141525.621568509@infradead.org> <87tuika83y.ffs@tglx> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=c3=a9_Almeida?= In-Reply-To: <87tuika83y.ffs@tglx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Às 11:49 de 16/09/21, Thomas Gleixner escreveu: > On Wed, Sep 15 2021 at 10:34, Paul Eggert wrote: > >> On 9/15/21 8:37 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> I utterly detest timespec.. it makes no sense what so ever. >>> >>> Can't we just, for new syscalls, simply use a s64 nsec argument and call >>> it a day? >> >> This would stop working in the year 2262. Not a good idea. > > Make it u64 and it stops in 2552, i.e. 584 years from now which is > plenty. Lot's of the kernel internal timekeeping will stop working at > that point, so that interface is the least of my worries. And TBH, my > worries about the Y2552 problem are extremly close to zero. > What do we win by using u64 instead of timespec? Or what's so bad about timespec?