Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp2244012pxb; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 05:44:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNeVD1LMk12C32aGsT9cU+bF17hOFyGIQWqNnlUPSKrb6jnUUf0UdtF4eAz80QLy3cEgRz X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e82:: with SMTP id p2mr11920385ejf.50.1631882697811; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 05:44:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631882697; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bEvBy6ym4PANozj3Jph5xs2In2TMadfBb+Q0rsCbGETVNEFkkzacednxGPtaVK+Ucm jKgO3sctzWJZMUwMZG6+VN13h+lFG/ZQjnt13p+4TqMUbVz9WXfYp1biPN4dPzgX/J5R 7h2x0H6Jd9mKdt79aJMk/4pf/hNVL1KRFPHPpx2NP8MoI+mYvin7ekYQIrTvqdAs21dA pf6Y4g9aUiQSQO/NDeB2ibWEjgQlqoZlkK0IKpthV1/+5421oWo54FfeJrlO7lfjrLFL DEbZfG2KiMxYveQdPuOOa+ntOmZWAkm7O6iogdUq1kUlOQqvqM3PxfPMYzaS/XFGDKmR O1rA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :subject; bh=N6BwRFuO6i78w99TUvxbqMCrd28nFnjUUd4AiOu+N2A=; b=Eh6VoNzbsD1N1j7YikX1rqYZZ43i2O2ZoyjSObEy2n8aufnSFYE/jBppdDbeVc+/94 Qf8enhiam6nGFjuFIrnpf5lJBZTSYQjY6lYqn48ThCUW0hXN/JxY0IrCuSqGw/M1SwPe f6s8HgUMygR/LygJIi+i2/iI0BX6iBGO8aMipQixbO2cMPKwQP059+slcChyWIcM9Jay srRIlZKtcZpJ2y2HwQ7TrNb33UHO+cNMjKX/5zOXUSvEGDEkAtXMRyJ+AZPUDhLP1/RD ILQnkulG/bJ4ZU/7n5nqwr9pUBHXnG4bEqd29UEcLIpLrhrYFQ3RHLh5AHKnUVGB6x4v VvWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w21si6796246ejk.187.2021.09.17.05.44.33; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 05:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234526AbhIQGpf (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 02:45:35 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:15432 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231786AbhIQGpe (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 02:45:34 -0400 Received: from dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4H9kpT6bq9zR50D; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:40:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500018.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.186) by dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:44:09 +0800 Received: from [10.67.101.251] (10.67.101.251) by dggpeml500018.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:44:09 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group From: Zhang Qiao To: , , , CC: , References: <20210915064030.2231-1-zhangqiao22@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20210915064030.2231-1-zhangqiao22@huawei.com> Message-ID: <79c369d4-ba96-97d4-7bda-14672f442855@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:44:09 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.101.251] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To dggpeml500018.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.186) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ?? 2021/9/15 14:40, Zhang Qiao ะด??: > There is a small race between copy_process() and sched_fork() > where child->sched_task_group point to an already freed pointer. > > parent doing fork() | someone moving the parent > to another cgroup > -------------------------------+------------------------------- > copy_process() > + dup_task_struct()<1> > parent move to another cgroup, > and free the old cgroup. <2> > + sched_fork() > + __set_task_cpu()<3> > + task_fork_fair() > + sched_slice()<4> > > In the worst case, this bug can lead to "use-after-free" and > cause panic as shown above, > (1)parent copy its sched_task_group to child at <1>; > (2)someone move the parent to another cgroup and free the old > cgroup at <2>; > (3)the sched_task_group and cfs_rq that belong to the old cgroup > will be accessed at <3> and <4>, which cause a panic: > > [89249.732198] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer > dereference at 0000000000000000 > [89249.732701] PGD 8000001fa0a86067 P4D 8000001fa0a86067 PUD > 2029955067 PMD 0 > [89249.733005] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI > [89249.733288] CPU: 7 PID: 648398 Comm: ebizzy Kdump: loaded > Tainted: G OE --------- - - 4.18.0.x86_64+ #1 > [89249.734318] RIP: 0010:sched_slice+0x84/0xc0 > .... > [89249.737910] Call Trace: > [89249.738181] task_fork_fair+0x81/0x120 > [89249.738457] sched_fork+0x132/0x240 > [89249.738732] copy_process.part.5+0x675/0x20e0 > [89249.739010] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x63f/0x690 > [89249.739286] _do_fork+0xcd/0x3b0 > [89249.739558] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x1d0 > [89249.739830] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca > [89249.740107] RIP: 0033:0x7f04418cd7e1 > > Between cgroup_can_fork() and cgroup_post_fork(), the cgroup > membership and thus sched_task_group can't change. So update > child's sched_task_group at sched_post_fork() and move task_fork() > and __set_task_cpu() (where accees the sched_task_group) from > sched_fork() to sched_post_fork(). > > Fixes: 8323f26ce342 ("sched: Fix race in task_group") > Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao > --- > include/linux/sched/task.h | 3 ++- > kernel/fork.c | 2 +- > kernel/sched/core.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched/task.h b/include/linux/sched/task.h > index ef02be869cf2..ba88a6987400 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sched/task.h > +++ b/include/linux/sched/task.h > @@ -54,7 +54,8 @@ extern asmlinkage void schedule_tail(struct task_struct *prev); > extern void init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu); > > extern int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p); > -extern void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p); > +extern void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p, > + struct kernel_clone_args *kargs); > extern void sched_dead(struct task_struct *p); > > void __noreturn do_task_dead(void); > diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c > index 38681ad44c76..0e4251dc5436 100644 > --- a/kernel/fork.c > +++ b/kernel/fork.c > @@ -2405,7 +2405,7 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process( > write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); > > proc_fork_connector(p); > - sched_post_fork(p); > + sched_post_fork(p, args); > cgroup_post_fork(p, args); > perf_event_fork(p); > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index c4462c454ab9..57544053be5a 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -4328,8 +4328,6 @@ int sysctl_schedstats(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer, > */ > int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p) > { > - unsigned long flags; > - > __sched_fork(clone_flags, p); > /* > * We mark the process as NEW here. This guarantees that > @@ -4375,24 +4373,6 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p) > > init_entity_runnable_average(&p->se); > > - /* > - * The child is not yet in the pid-hash so no cgroup attach races, > - * and the cgroup is pinned to this child due to cgroup_fork() > - * is ran before sched_fork(). > - * > - * Silence PROVE_RCU. > - */ > - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); > - rseq_migrate(p); > - /* > - * We're setting the CPU for the first time, we don't migrate, > - * so use __set_task_cpu(). > - */ > - __set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id()); > - if (p->sched_class->task_fork) > - p->sched_class->task_fork(p); > - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); > - > #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_INFO > if (likely(sched_info_on())) > memset(&p->sched_info, 0, sizeof(p->sched_info)); > @@ -4408,8 +4388,29 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p) > return 0; > } > > -void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p) > +void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p, struct kernel_clone_args *kargs) > { > + unsigned long flags; > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED > + struct task_group *tg; > +#endif > + > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED > + tg = container_of(kargs->cset->subsys[cpu_cgrp_id], > + struct task_group, css); > + p->sched_task_group = autogroup_task_group(p, tg); > +#endif > + rseq_migrate(p); > + /* > + * We're setting the CPU for the first time, we don't migrate, > + * so use __set_task_cpu(). > + */ > + __set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id()); > + if (p->sched_class->task_fork) > + p->sched_class->task_fork(p); > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); > + > uclamp_post_fork(p); > } hello, scheduler folks, could you please have a look? thanks. --- Zhang Qiao > >