Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp2367690pxb; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:16:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz2r/c7ONNTlzc99Di8BAhfIdTa6Xxopwf9RBV6TDBDAaETNAS+5eSg9lkJvQqikzy8d41Y X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:16cd:: with SMTP id t13mr12486261ejd.140.1631891761136; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:16:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631891761; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fdkPiAX89MUN+7VrY+7nqs9JL9/BAUBCNEZjmp7w/JuaUW2h8UJCgWUz+3yjUU2YMy iroekaWg+/hoqJxLIvcSsFu9FppWd1Syq5xtQzhddMtNfc6+c8DR6JoOQByEx/0jDDIp mlfGdxKEWT3p6IY/DcD28mHcUW/ebRjd9bLjfKivUTj0TsjYLk20HhmH+GBV8VV8GjtD zjc46sXaurt0RxVw8lkexiRWO+tZrlGzM2HLggvi6eg+3Zm9QcjA9qnCBEigx+jomhpg dBCtmuajpBrO1OVvXn3zLnPNIMxnf47uz719EnfUTHUkeOEuuM2WbG3IFPmj55q/gQmU zLMQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=c4aeYE/1WubxwQKowc8xLfAYzuxqBeZv8Y9/pcwiKsU=; b=G4W/gtKJn641a9z+8PBNjK3QVdOw0SfxAJzc3AO78/Z7PJ7uVDKjl9eLWElh/lDfiF pZ8ISTXRJaSRA9jbXgA2lSxQJeRou5NVQ/z4pJsVFW1HsXF1MrgVIVdwpOTwFyqnLvt6 dK2ETWNiqWQGduWSLgnO6B1S3H/rTpBteL79IcSv/8/xwZMCzTa6eEJx55zXGuMaFWN5 PtDUB002DGHK3nKsGZj3WchsNSxtHsmrh9h2IIpaHAKFtayvmHL6yFhzRVF8uClUXBfD YSUAxVWgoysQilb8ekbtBSUGhuiPtAzrfvV1GCn3vxwKLq9P+u0rMOqp2y2OkQ4qCWWC OESw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v3si6288017eda.624.2021.09.17.08.15.36; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344207AbhIQNgJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:36:09 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:53334 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245234AbhIQNfm (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:35:42 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81636113E; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9CAB03F719; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:34:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sudeep Holla , Cristian Marussi , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Jassi Brar Subject: [PATCH v2 11/14] mailbox: pcc: Drop handling invalid bit-width in {read,write}_register Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:33:54 +0100 Message-Id: <20210917133357.1911092-12-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210917133357.1911092-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <20210917133357.1911092-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org pcc_chan_reg_init now checks if the register bit width is within the list [8, 16, 32, 64] and flags error if that is not the case. Therefore there is no need to handling invalid bit-width in both read_register and write_register. We can drop that along with the return values for these 2 functions. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/mailbox/pcc.c | 24 ++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c index ed635f7d3f60..4bace1fa48f0 100644 --- a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c +++ b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c @@ -110,10 +110,8 @@ static struct mbox_controller pcc_mbox_ctrl = {}; * The below read_register and write_registers are used to read and * write from perf critical registers such as PCC doorbell register */ -static int read_register(void __iomem *vaddr, u64 *val, unsigned int bit_width) +static void read_register(void __iomem *vaddr, u64 *val, unsigned int bit_width) { - int ret_val = 0; - switch (bit_width) { case 8: *val = readb(vaddr); @@ -127,19 +125,11 @@ static int read_register(void __iomem *vaddr, u64 *val, unsigned int bit_width) case 64: *val = readq(vaddr); break; - default: - pr_debug("Error: Cannot read register of %u bit width", - bit_width); - ret_val = -EFAULT; - break; } - return ret_val; } -static int write_register(void __iomem *vaddr, u64 val, unsigned int bit_width) +static void write_register(void __iomem *vaddr, u64 val, unsigned int bit_width) { - int ret_val = 0; - switch (bit_width) { case 8: writeb(val, vaddr); @@ -153,13 +143,7 @@ static int write_register(void __iomem *vaddr, u64 val, unsigned int bit_width) case 64: writeq(val, vaddr); break; - default: - pr_debug("Error: Cannot write register of %u bit width", - bit_width); - ret_val = -EFAULT; - break; } - return ret_val; } static int pcc_chan_reg_read(struct pcc_chan_reg *reg, u64 *val) @@ -172,7 +156,7 @@ static int pcc_chan_reg_read(struct pcc_chan_reg *reg, u64 *val) } if (reg->vaddr) - ret = read_register(reg->vaddr, val, reg->gas->bit_width); + read_register(reg->vaddr, val, reg->gas->bit_width); else ret = acpi_read(val, reg->gas); @@ -187,7 +171,7 @@ static int pcc_chan_reg_write(struct pcc_chan_reg *reg, u64 val) return 0; if (reg->vaddr) - ret = write_register(reg->vaddr, val, reg->gas->bit_width); + write_register(reg->vaddr, val, reg->gas->bit_width); else ret = acpi_write(val, reg->gas); -- 2.25.1