Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965118AbWLMUCV (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:02:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965134AbWLMUCU (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:02:20 -0500 Received: from a222036.upc-a.chello.nl ([62.163.222.36]:49808 "EHLO laptopd505.fenrus.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965088AbWLMUCT (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:02:19 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs From: Arjan van de Ven To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1166018020.27217.805.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:02:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1166040131.27217.888.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-2.fc6) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 526 Lines: 14 > . > > In addition the cases I can think of allowed_affinity is the wrong > name. suggested_affinity sounds like what you are trying to implement > and when it is merely a suggestion and not a hard limit it doesn't > make sense to export like this. it really IS a hard limit. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/