Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 17 Sep 2021 22:43:52 +0800
From:   Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc:     Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] kernel/watchdog: adapt the watchdog_hld interface
 for async model
Message-ID: <YUSpqCqA4jLboCVP@piliu.users.ipa.redhat.com>
References: <20210915035103.15586-1-kernelfans@gmail.com>
 <20210915035103.15586-4-kernelfans@gmail.com>
 <YUMAUE5RFJAtAS/z@alley>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YUMAUE5RFJAtAS/z@alley>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:29:04AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2021-09-15 11:51:01, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > When lockup_detector_init()->watchdog_nmi_probe(), PMU may be not ready
> > yet. E.g. on arm64, PMU is not ready until
> > device_initcall(armv8_pmu_driver_init).  And it is deeply integrated
> > with the driver model and cpuhp. Hence it is hard to push this
> > initialization before smp_init().
> > 
> > But it is easy to take an opposite approach by enabling watchdog_hld to
> > get the capability of PMU async.
> 
> This is another cryptic description. I have probably got it after
> looking at the 5th patch (was not Cc :-(
> 
> > The async model is achieved by introducing an extra parameter notifier
> > of watchdog_nmi_probe().
> 
> I would say that the code is horrible and looks too complex.
> 
> What about simply calling watchdog_nmi_probe() and
> lockup_detector_setup() once again when watchdog_nmi_probe()
> failed in lockup_detector_init()?
> 
It may work. But there is still a way to report the PMU NMI capability
to watchdog layer accurately. And the API should be extened somehow.

I am thinking something, maybe I can model in another way.
> Or do not call lockup_detector_init() at all in
> kernel_init_freeable() when PMU is not ready yet.
> 

This may be not a good choice. Since lockup_detector_init() had better
be ready as early as possible, especially before drivers.


Thanks,

	Pingfan