Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp912185pxb; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 23:52:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzojRsFJyR7AM8/T+SuNcN0BT8X9eXVLMxKm5RrZX1OEwN0SQiPe0a/BAlVEnGMWCom7+9X X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3e89:: with SMTP id l131mr14668448ioa.74.1632034334503; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 23:52:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1632034334; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YvpgDR6kvXDHCQdOekHgGjbsEJSr0BRls2RIwIaZuYI/ZRZaG8kTmzcmWvFmDlHksb BIqB0sQfs315lAVzsVhtKKxLXCxR04CvsCSKl7UwfUDhaMivRSfKHKFZ0efWhwk4YqFG mSQYHh85ROALCyye3jrzDPynPauswUh7FPoXfxf4tStXOTTafk0+/Ueo89fwefUb3rL9 KKqAFrxefxhFdiAZE4U7KPGs/MtpQHF+BoLq7f9RSKT/ccSYLAzcsiiHKns4geUPzgtt F6PJmIusc3pSgJtga33lJYYJ/ZpsI1kX18ycuci66arAzU0WM6GxiHLmqiN4rbpxqKzC 3lUw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=UVE7QZS3RWL2QAHWQXoCR4muirEC/eJJlq5hFMqUVLk=; b=ZjC4S1QGAkr21FDgeFIKVC710AmF6hTYQFlTIaJ0oH5/zcTJ5wi1cZIL1lUbFIoQ/a TSG2SHW7QdlnflY9GYt96PuWfeP6qf73lByC+/fF4atk20DQnJsRdEcjbjk+Yr/Yr9jJ WGk0u5Fv98NZfhqjcV750i8O+rVDC0m3tpxIlG3DIvK8wub4WMRKfLydfFy/pykqD5FS 9IVorsQauNs1NI5hN9bJPclvYiZuTymS558clmYwJZ3edg/wYa/bx+wE5eEwVEsdtlXQ fwiZCwy7asp3ekQzvBl5icki5QapVVsyi40nYxW068y4xlHSuSuh2XadP8PIr7GWPYt/ 4TFA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=atis6Oaz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n2si11128330ilt.29.2021.09.18.23.52.03; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 23:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=atis6Oaz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238208AbhIRRd6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 18 Sep 2021 13:33:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56244 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235684AbhIRRd6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Sep 2021 13:33:58 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39D6FC061574 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 10:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id w29so20633804wra.8 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 10:32:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UVE7QZS3RWL2QAHWQXoCR4muirEC/eJJlq5hFMqUVLk=; b=atis6OazR0/togfP8brQNQvC7+QKZJNyciGtQ1X6sWCGSoMGn3KhPptr4NAG5oEbIY 48pfpY+T1gjwiG0yc/zOCLIjHf6crzb74w3tnxuSeaiV4+8kiqQT50jZZgeRVEPTezHa ga2O4V/hCOsB8OJ6wn2xKrHmLRhmBTU4/1hhxiCL5c/6yb1/21Gxi6kGT6YNFjRZN0UA bvjGcGmCmip9IZZ2nEn9SCWSTOQMxU43aF949F86t4RBQBww4OzLpL5aiEK4kGc0yja4 Ova/NKGpETJ5RNGnCzyw3EL1IXP6Nn4LPu05dsGtCIwv/A745+HJkL5JMBAUL0ShjbUM 5QyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UVE7QZS3RWL2QAHWQXoCR4muirEC/eJJlq5hFMqUVLk=; b=O7xjyHt8SidUFmWIZatPy3MYMC1zZqn3G7y+pcbXy13rhROI3DqVC0mLWG9N4JeyVv Pph8hQarXdzwq1qn6nTzfBhveiKyY6cSIbQOORsXQw323AOK9U0fq16ho9WMFqBpYELo UsAXO8CcSO/TY6HtldgHfs+5Lc4YpFE+2PP7MbihZLUB5NsWMN5Hl9Qtpvm0AbcIhJ3s 9+ipV0b3ftLFA3w1AFMcMx+i0XVB9q46G7Y40OwO5dWUGd5XoWqKx6DrkhlKhMKZwhlq GXbosCmrqmsChR/+WEn40br205zsYmEV8VMdPSBmkTJXHM4tTHKx0bVHe7mQtFrymRqo j9Bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530l6cHG756V3upBmO4j+csT2p2B8tH25I6vq1y762GedRiI6cIY k/XRfgnPHWJYzCSXFpYn9hyN5a16wH4j9w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8170:: with SMTP id 103mr19241290wrm.167.1631986352831; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 10:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:8108:96c0:3b88::cde? ([2a02:8108:96c0:3b88::cde]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y64sm7475517wmc.38.2021.09.18.10.32.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 18 Sep 2021 10:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0701af92-b341-f7b0-8a0c-3bea8a69f580@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 19:32:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: staging: r8188eu: Can odm_DynamicTxPowerNIC() be removed? Content-Language: en-US To: Larry Finger , Phillip Potter Cc: Greg KH , "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <7f1c135a-d85d-d271-f315-d665a5fe1472@gmail.com> <89d9424a-d792-633a-d8e8-cebe7c3a2e20@lwfinger.net> From: Michael Straube In-Reply-To: <89d9424a-d792-633a-d8e8-cebe7c3a2e20@lwfinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/18/21 18:46, Larry Finger wrote: > On 9/18/21 08:31, Michael Straube wrote: >> Hi Larry, Phillip and all. >> >> While removing code that checks for the chip type I stumbled upon this: >> >> >> void odm_DynamicTxPowerNIC(struct odm_dm_struct *pDM_Odm) >> { >>      if (!(pDM_Odm->SupportAbility & ODM_BB_DYNAMIC_TXPWR)) >>          return; >> >>      if (pDM_Odm->SupportICType == ODM_RTL8188E) { >>          /*  ??? */ >>          /*  This part need to be redefined. */ >>      } >> } >> >> >> (pDM_Odm->SupportICType == ODM_RTL8188E) is always true in this driver. >> Currently the function does nothing and the driver seems to work fine. >> Because of the comment I'm not sure if the whole function can just be >> removed? > > Yes, I agree. No later driver does anything with this routine, thus it > is dead and can be removed. > > Larry > Ok, thank you. Regards, Michael