Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:34:41 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc:     Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/mce: Get rid of the ->quirk_no_way_out()
 indirect call
Message-ID: <YUhHoclcgh/qBNG9@zn.tnic>
References: <20210917105355.2368-1-bp@alien8.de>
 <20210917105355.2368-5-bp@alien8.de>
 <YUgWu14GqmjJ36+R@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YUgWu14GqmjJ36+R@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:06:03PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Someday all these tests for random vendor/family/model/stepping could be
> refactored into a x86_match_cpu() lookup table (now that x86_match_cpu
> can handle steppings). But that's a topic for a different patch series.

If it remains somewhat readable, sure. If it turns into my favourite
code in severity.c then probably not so much.

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette