Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To:     Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     saurav.girepunje@hotmail.com, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net,
        phil@philpotter.co.uk, straube.linux@gmail.com,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: core: remove the function power_saving_wk_hdl
Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:13:54 +0200
Message-ID: <1651026.4NJzAxWbHA@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <YUhkFvz4BpLv0eoN@kroah.com>
References: <YTub30ZRG3oLbxQW@user> <45c4de06-f618-4352-91ea-885edecdf8bb@gmail.com> <YUhkFvz4BpLv0eoN@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk

On Monday, September 20, 2021 12:36:06 PM CEST Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:52:50PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 13/09/21 9:48 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:24:39PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> > > > Remove the function power_saving_wk_hdl() as it just calling
> > > > the rtw_ps_processor().Instead of power_saving_wk_hdl() call directly
> > > > rtw_ps_processor().
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > []
> > > 
> > > Also does not apply to my tree.  Please rebase against my staging-next
> > > branch and resend.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > I always do rebase against your staging-testing branch. Can you help me 
to
> > understand.When we need to rebase on staging-next. Do we always need to
> > rebase against staging-next..!
> 
> Yes, you should.  When you are working on code that lots of other people
> are working on, there will be conflicts like this, and you just need to
> stay on top of it.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Sorry, Greg. I'm confused... :(

As far as I know, everyone here make patches for staging-testing. You apply 
them to staging-testing first and, about 24 hours later, you merge them into 
staging-next. 

In fact I receive two distinct messages, one after the other, when you apply 
to staging-testing and then to staging-next. 

This is the what I've always done here and you haven't ever asked me to 
rebase against staging-next... So, why are you asking for doing that rebase 
on staging-next to Saurav?

Thanks,

Fabio