Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751831AbWLNIep (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:34:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751832AbWLNIep (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:34:45 -0500 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:37329 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751831AbWLNIep (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:34:45 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs References: <1166018020.27217.805.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061213194332.GA29185@elte.hu> <45806137.4020403@linux.intel.com> <45810383.2060708@linux.intel.com> <458109FA.3060304@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:34:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <458109FA.3060304@linux.intel.com> (Arjan van de Ven's message of "Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:23:22 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 635 Lines: 19 Arjan van de Ven writes: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> 1) is very real today >>> 2) is partially real on some of the bigger numa stuff already. >> >> You have said you the NUMA cases is handled in another way already? > > the numa case of "I prefer that cpu" is handled. Not the "I cannot work on > those". How is the NUMA case of I prefer that cpu handled? Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/