Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932822AbWLNPsV (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:48:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932823AbWLNPsV (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:48:21 -0500 Received: from mail.tbdnetworks.com ([204.13.84.99]:55843 "EHLO mail.tbdnetworks.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932822AbWLNPsT (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:48:19 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1337 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:48:19 EST Subject: Re: Why is "Memory split" Kconfig option only for EMBEDDED? From: Norbert Kiesel To: Pavel Machek Cc: Alejandro Riveira =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez?= , Adrian Bunk , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20061214144750.GA4022@ucw.cz> References: <1165405350.5954.213.camel@titan.tbdnetworks.com> <1165406299.3233.436.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1165407548.5954.224.camel@titan.tbdnetworks.com> <20061206131003.GF24140@stusta.de> <20061209132742.7a25dcb5@localhost.localdomain> <1165679105.7455.116.camel@titan.tbdnetworks.com> <20061214144750.GA4022@ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: TBD Networks Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:24:44 +0100 Message-Id: <1166109884.8815.157.camel@titan.tbdnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1478 Lines: 35 On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 14:47 +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > So far all first-hand experiences I heard of were positive (i.e. I did > > not get an emaail from anyone saying: It had a negative effect for me), > > so I propose to apply the patch from Con Kolivas. The wording in the > > description still very strongly recommends to not change that value, and > > it's still dependent on EXPERIMENTAL. I append the patch just because > > There's a big difference between 'experimental' and 'known to broke > obscure userspace apps'. True, but abusing EMBEDDED for "only do that if you know what you are doing and if it breaks, you have to keep the pieces" is not good either. Some other places that seem to fall into the same category are IPX_INTERN ("...This might break existing applications...") which is neither EMBEDDED nor EXPERIMENTAL or RMW_INSNS ("...It is very likely that this will cause serious problems on any Amiga...") that is dependent on ADVANCED. Anyway, perhaps I should just select EMBEDDED although I don't have a small system (though a 6 year old 1Ghz K7 with 1GB mem might be considered small by some people these days :-), and ignore all the other options that pop up through this. Best, Norbert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/