Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp2517000pxb; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 01:21:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIdRU5wc+n9AcyTmBZX1bSsTzZ/4f2WsbD7f/M3LrP0RhL3l/64T4+jWiBa/EqDaQJcR6V X-Received: by 2002:a02:1049:: with SMTP id 70mr5458948jay.123.1632212518763; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 01:21:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1632212518; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bzrplgH73zxPBX7stM/+eqkVhM3bX9sdMsZhqLwwfJdp1IfH9+njtfWgUzZvAxR8Tl a4Tp1s20FA7AjIQMZoxS2krW7sIHBQP7CVnJiwy2lBJAwtClvbtk3krZU/SfHkoCEW+8 e347ZQ6buNlELVL8mqywQzJqomYw+/yLy9joBpezFaqwByN3Ot0W28NuygPq2Gaf36Ek KfIz61Nnvdiv/h9QZbaKpAanV80a2gug9D17yPDonlX+dUctF0wd5VwjdK74BtS95nHk U9X6bocRjNlgiR0NQveh+CFkhPozaAgsV6NiCvUP7SdLU78wXS3pin3lD4UCDP0wPd5s xVGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=24sL4O8l+Ut2EyeP808I9abN0oDz62fwc1Pk3caXJhA=; b=QTuy4ApHMBBDLWN/3VetiBr5td83e2KAvQkmN1jqmJ/ZAw+onR5a77q4BPgOqzy84B TyF9trmTDYLAGlzWZHLJpVhtr0B5rOzKzUOySQ5A8ysJacy8J7Cg26dwFE1Q5FkkKmtf qjZbF1rf0Yu/ZdE1L2nt7UAzUkBlbAx8NH3cedGOHZshkzMyPGzI8o8uhXo1G6P2CKmN ygAU7mSRw4YwgfawBQiXhRXwlzixkzTTz2hML+LiFk6SL+vluddy8AJEkSptTSgws5Xl ZmiFSo+tD4ZTBVxDYMvG50Bov3IAv7Tu8fWXNTcv9zT++PGuL9EnsdXQ2v84je0J4Wpg 9zNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n7si17077508ili.27.2021.09.21.01.21.45; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 01:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230496AbhIUIVi (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 04:21:38 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:55477 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230421AbhIUIVi (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 04:21:38 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 9386F67373; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:20:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:20:07 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Mike Rapoport , Christoph Hellwig , David Hildenbrand , Robin Murphy , Alex Bee , Will Deacon , Andrew Morton , Anshuman Khandual , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux ARM Subject: Re: [BUG 5.14] arm64/mm: dma memory mapping fails (in some cases) Message-ID: <20210921082007.GA29121@lst.de> References: <20210824173741.GC623@arm.com> <0908ce39-7e30-91fa-68ef-11620f9596ae@arm.com> <60a11eba-2910-3b5f-ef96-97d4556c1596@redhat.com> <20210825102044.GA3420@arm.com> <20210918051843.GA16104@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 11:57:58AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > As this WARN_ON(pfn_valid()) is only present in dma_map_resource() it's > > probably safe to drop it entirely. > > I agree, we should drop it. IIUC dma_map_resource() does not create any > kernel mapping to cause problems with attribute aliasing. You'd need a > prior devm_ioremap_resource() if you want access to that range from the > CPU side. For arm64 at least, the latter ends up with a > pfn_is_map_memory() check. It doesn't create any new mappings. The only real issue is that it does the wrong thing for RAM in a way that might not be noticed on simple (x86/PC) platforms.