Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:56:01 +0000
From:   Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH] mm, sl[au]b: Introduce lockless cache
Message-ID: <20210921105601.GA3121@kvm.asia-northeast3-a.c.our-ratio-313919.internal>
References: <20210920154816.31832-1-42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
 <YUkErK1vVZMht4s8@casper.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YUkErK1vVZMht4s8@casper.infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

Hello Matthew,
I love your suggestion to make it more cache-friendly (and batch
allocation) and it sounds good to me. I appreciate it so much.

But give me some time (from just one to few days) to
read relevant papers. and then I'll reply to your suggestions
and send v3 with your suggestions in mind.

Cheers,
Hyeonggon