Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] qnx: avoid -Wstringop-overread warning, again
Date:   Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:49:45 +0200
Message-ID: <1700211.4herOUoSWf@alarsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgaaUgz58Avt_W=7mAsp1DSoLh79mkcGASa-OUbPmjvVQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20210920121208.54732-1-arnd@kernel.org> <2955101.xlVK0Xs8nM@alarsen.net> <CAHk-=wgaaUgz58Avt_W=7mAsp1DSoLh79mkcGASa-OUbPmjvVQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk

On Tuesday, 2021-09-21 17:40 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'd rather use that third "clearly neither" structure member, just to
> clarify what is going on.

I'm perfectly fine with that.

> Anyway, I committed my patch that Arnd had tested, with a slightly
> expanded comment. I'm sure yours would have compiled cleanly too.

When it turns up in the tree, I'll cook up a fix for the strlen() issue in
fs/qnx4/namei.c following your scheme.

Cheers
Anders