Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:59:23 +0100
From:   Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To:     Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, joro@8bytes.org,
        will.deacon@arm.com, mst@redhat.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
        eric.auger@redhat.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
        jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com,
        Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 02/11] iommu/virtio: Maintain a list of endpoints
 served by viommu_dev
Message-ID: <YUoBW13+CvIljUgc@myrica>
References: <20210423095147.27922-1-vivek.gautam@arm.com>
 <20210423095147.27922-3-vivek.gautam@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210423095147.27922-3-vivek.gautam@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 03:21:38PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Keeping a record of list of endpoints that are served by the virtio-iommu
> device would help in redirecting the requests of page faults to the
> correct endpoint device to handle such requests.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> index 50039070e2aa..c970f386f031 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct viommu_dev {
>  	spinlock_t			request_lock;
>  	struct list_head		requests;
>  	void				*evts;
> +	struct list_head		endpoints;

As we're going to search by ID, an xarray or rb_tree would be more
appropriate than a list

>  
>  	/* Device configuration */
>  	struct iommu_domain_geometry	geometry;
> @@ -115,6 +116,12 @@ struct viommu_endpoint {
>  	void				*pgtf;
>  };
>  
> +struct viommu_ep_entry {
> +	u32				eid;
> +	struct viommu_endpoint		*vdev;
> +	struct list_head		list;
> +};

No need for a separate struct, I think you can just add the list head and
id into viommu_endpoint.

> +
>  struct viommu_request {
>  	struct list_head		list;
>  	void				*writeback;
> @@ -573,6 +580,7 @@ static int viommu_probe_endpoint(struct viommu_dev *viommu, struct device *dev)
>  	size_t probe_len;
>  	struct virtio_iommu_req_probe *probe;
>  	struct virtio_iommu_probe_property *prop;
> +	struct viommu_ep_entry *ep;
>  	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
>  	struct viommu_endpoint *vdev = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>  
> @@ -640,6 +648,18 @@ static int viommu_probe_endpoint(struct viommu_dev *viommu, struct device *dev)
>  		prop = (void *)probe->properties + cur;
>  		type = le16_to_cpu(prop->type) & VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_MASK;
>  	}
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_free;
> +
> +	ep = kzalloc(sizeof(*ep), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ep) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out_free;
> +	}
> +	ep->eid = probe->endpoint;
> +	ep->vdev = vdev;
> +
> +	list_add(&ep->list, &viommu->endpoints);

This should be in viommu_probe_device() (viommu_probe_endpoint() is only
called if F_PROBE is negotiated). I think we need a lock for this
list/xarray

Thanks,
Jean

>  
>  out_free:
>  	kfree(probe);
> @@ -1649,6 +1669,7 @@ static int viommu_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	viommu->dev = dev;
>  	viommu->vdev = vdev;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&viommu->requests);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&viommu->endpoints);
>  
>  	ret = viommu_init_vqs(viommu);
>  	if (ret)
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>