Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:03:25 +0100
From:   Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To:     Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, joro@8bytes.org,
        will.deacon@arm.com, mst@redhat.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
        eric.auger@redhat.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
        jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com,
        Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 03/11] iommu/virtio: Handle incoming page faults
Message-ID: <YUoCTV6WYxxE10qj@myrica>
References: <20210423095147.27922-1-vivek.gautam@arm.com>
 <20210423095147.27922-4-vivek.gautam@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210423095147.27922-4-vivek.gautam@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 03:21:39PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Redirect the incoming page faults to the registered fault handler
> that can take the fault information such as, pasid, page request
> group-id, address and pasid flags.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c      | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> index c970f386f031..fd237cad1ce5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,13 @@
>  /* Some architectures need an Address Space ID for each page table */
>  DEFINE_XARRAY_ALLOC1(viommu_asid_xa);
>  
> +struct viommu_dev_pri_work {
> +	struct work_struct		work;
> +	struct viommu_dev		*dev;
> +	struct virtio_iommu_fault	*vfault;
> +	u32				endpoint;
> +};
> +
>  struct viommu_dev {
>  	struct iommu_device		iommu;
>  	struct device			*dev;
> @@ -49,6 +56,8 @@ struct viommu_dev {
>  	struct list_head		requests;
>  	void				*evts;
>  	struct list_head		endpoints;
> +	struct workqueue_struct		*pri_wq;
> +	struct viommu_dev_pri_work	*pri_work;

IOPF already has a workqueue, so the driver doesn't need one.
iommu_report_device_fault() should be fast enough to be called from the
event handler.

>  
>  	/* Device configuration */
>  	struct iommu_domain_geometry	geometry;
> @@ -666,6 +675,58 @@ static int viommu_probe_endpoint(struct viommu_dev *viommu, struct device *dev)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void viommu_handle_ppr(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct viommu_dev_pri_work *pwork =
> +				container_of(work, struct viommu_dev_pri_work, work);
> +	struct viommu_dev *viommu = pwork->dev;
> +	struct virtio_iommu_fault *vfault = pwork->vfault;
> +	struct viommu_endpoint *vdev;
> +	struct viommu_ep_entry *ep;
> +	struct iommu_fault_event fault_evt = {
> +		.fault.type = IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQ,
> +	};
> +	struct iommu_fault_page_request *prq = &fault_evt.fault.prm;
> +
> +	u32 flags	= le32_to_cpu(vfault->flags);
> +	u32 prq_flags	= le32_to_cpu(vfault->pr_evt_flags);
> +	u32 endpoint	= pwork->endpoint;
> +
> +	memset(prq, 0, sizeof(struct iommu_fault_page_request));

The fault_evt struct is already initialized

> +	prq->addr = le64_to_cpu(vfault->address);
> +
> +	if (prq_flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_PRQ_F_LAST_PAGE)
> +		prq->flags |= IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_LAST_PAGE;
> +	if (prq_flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_PRQ_F_PASID_VALID) {
> +		prq->flags |= IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID;
> +		prq->pasid = le32_to_cpu(vfault->pasid);
> +		prq->grpid = le32_to_cpu(vfault->grpid);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_READ)
> +		prq->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_READ;
> +	if (flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_WRITE)
> +		prq->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_WRITE;
> +	if (flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_EXEC)
> +		prq->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_EXEC;
> +	if (flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_PRIV)
> +		prq->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_PRIV;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(ep, &viommu->endpoints, list) {
> +		if (ep->eid == endpoint) {
> +			vdev = ep->vdev;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if ((prq_flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_PRQ_F_PASID_VALID) &&
> +	    (prq_flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_PRQ_F_NEEDS_PASID))
> +		prq->flags |= IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_RESPONSE_NEEDS_PASID;
> +
> +	if (iommu_report_device_fault(vdev->dev, &fault_evt))
> +		dev_err(vdev->dev, "Couldn't handle page request\n");

An error likely means that nobody registered a fault handler, but we could
display a few more details about the fault that would help debug the
endpoint

> +}
> +
>  static int viommu_fault_handler(struct viommu_dev *viommu,
>  				struct virtio_iommu_fault *fault)
>  {
> @@ -679,7 +740,13 @@ static int viommu_fault_handler(struct viommu_dev *viommu,
>  	u32 pasid	= le32_to_cpu(fault->pasid);
>  
>  	if (type == VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_PAGE_REQ) {
> -		dev_info(viommu->dev, "Page request fault - unhandled\n");
> +		dev_info_ratelimited(viommu->dev,
> +				     "Page request fault from EP %u\n",
> +				     endpoint);

That's rather for debugging the virtio-iommu driver, so should be
dev_dbg() (or removed entirely)

> +
> +		viommu->pri_work->vfault = fault;
> +		viommu->pri_work->endpoint = endpoint;
> +		queue_work(viommu->pri_wq, &viommu->pri_work->work);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1683,6 +1750,17 @@ static int viommu_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  		goto err_free_vqs;
>  	}
>  
> +	viommu->pri_work = kzalloc(sizeof(*viommu->pri_work), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!viommu->pri_work)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	viommu->pri_work->dev = viommu;
> +
> +	INIT_WORK(&viommu->pri_work->work, viommu_handle_ppr);
> +	viommu->pri_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("viommu-pri-wq");
> +	if (!viommu->pri_wq)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	viommu->map_flags = VIRTIO_IOMMU_MAP_F_READ | VIRTIO_IOMMU_MAP_F_WRITE;
>  	viommu->last_domain = ~0U;
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> index accc3318ce46..53aa88e6b077 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> @@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ struct virtio_iommu_req_invalidate {
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_READ		(1 << 0)
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_WRITE		(1 << 1)
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_EXEC		(1 << 2)
> +#define VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_PRIV		(1 << 3)

Should go in the previous patch. (I'd also prefer 'privileged' because in
this context 'priv' is easily read as 'private')

Thanks,
Jean

>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_ADDRESS		(1 << 8)
>  
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_DMA_UNRECOV	1
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>