Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 22 Sep 2021 00:34:01 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
        amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
        Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with
 cc_platform_has()
Message-ID: <20210921213401.i2pzaotgjvn4efgg@box.shutemov.name>
References: <cover.1631141919.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
 <367624d43d35d61d5c97a8b289d9ddae223636e9.1631141919.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
 <20210920192341.maue7db4lcbdn46x@box.shutemov.name>
 <77df37e1-0496-aed5-fd1d-302180f1edeb@amd.com>
 <YUoao0LlqQ6+uBrq@zn.tnic>
 <20210921212059.wwlytlmxoft4cdth@box.shutemov.name>
 <YUpONYwM4dQXAOJr@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YUpONYwM4dQXAOJr@zn.tnic>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:27:17PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:20:59AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > I still believe calling cc_platform_has() from __startup_64() is totally
> > broken as it lacks proper wrapping while accessing global variables.
> 
> Well, one of the issues on the AMD side was using boot_cpu_data too
> early and the Intel side uses it too. Can you replace those checks with
> is_tdx_guest() or whatever was the helper's name which would check
> whether the the kernel is running as a TDX guest, and see if that helps?

There's no need in Intel check this early. Only AMD need it. Maybe just
opencode them?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov