Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp37367pxb; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:04:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzeWhe3BCs7crLCwzKC0d8SpVgbekeDL0MMW75viSHGcSCa807ZwPbTseSngmLxHeiZcUNx X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:138a:: with SMTP id f10mr38592187ejc.89.1632272677100; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:04:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1632272677; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=u2xQKOJr2yuMsnFPjTlJ+FP0jOAFpx9vxqLhHj/h4KrPTv4mH2OuGJ7akwhcQbwg/R VvX05RmGcbOO8vTCtJo02eo5+MlUFZMl1QQh1erLReOpwK8tov6hguUWU7xq7p6mau6n alXLfZbmD8hpDF3po1hTppKzB9GLhLKGkZdX+QKuKqzISkDsPjxpiMUrAGi2JZ18orHh EDLtrTfbzjoTqnyyybmKgdBJZcmpSidOvyJafqsjttubBsogiydtxyTp3cjzuYRUyI+X IrUVtInqzpzXbwJs0KH5EjRErRACUFkDxq8U8RymA3muoggSfO2fEw7XY1H9VinOkPMW APLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=jjUeDPDF1YHObUoZjxKJB2Gi2KKuOAOryz8ngfflF1k=; b=pwylKVZJ5ew2bZx22kA7wy0xBKWYI3C7xHp91hQaE922uJcdzUugUVg6z0Zt9Vg6sg 84sTSlg5lWbCDhvOupo1QdBXAgTtSmIkzk4NbWeJ2zpI1DYIb/3tUTWQCI6+yBu3HZHt L6w+ikhuLmaXGJCfdyrC0Ziqyt9Osh1bwJJ9V+FPspR8cgQ71s08GAvZyw9cMgbpeicP wbL84+rOn/qO1DyTVGtnw6916be39yvBXfCjZUNwC9F0aUXa1F0KPoYz20VDuaElzF40 kd5N+48gCVSBysTcAUMoo6k75FKggAt3Wu2E25Q9b7a7tkQFyx4fwTvAZeamAwSVMTln jFSg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=vaWUJLsq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n29si771270edb.548.2021.09.21.18.03.50; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:04:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=vaWUJLsq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231205AbhIUXyx (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 19:54:53 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:45008 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229824AbhIUXyw (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 19:54:52 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 18LNrCqK081573; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:53:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1632268392; bh=jjUeDPDF1YHObUoZjxKJB2Gi2KKuOAOryz8ngfflF1k=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=vaWUJLsqSa2U6Ex5C4K1z8Rcpto4+UQoghsms0QR9Srx3t42smUFlOIQzuk30fa1n Svi8JX9+lghCPTDwAciVzlkpKbPGUD3HPloJ/BSwZetVVnF3yAQVEbEJpADO8TL97o UN0Ci6qtaVMQPxq9ZmuzI9i1sa668tgLSNuwms5Q= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 18LNrCOZ011409 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:53:12 -0500 Received: from DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:53:12 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:53:12 -0500 Received: from [10.250.37.219] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 18LNrC4q119274; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:53:12 -0500 Subject: Re: beaglebone black boot failure Linux v5.15.rc1 To: Robert Nelson CC: Drew Fustini , Tony Lindgren , Matti Vaittinen , Grygorii Strashko , "Vaittinen, Matti" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Barker , Peter Ujfalusi , =?UTF-8?Q?Beno=c3=aet_Cousson?= , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <120a0ca4-28c7-5a7b-f1ab-2015c8817bda@fi.rohmeurope.com> <0679a5bb-88d1-077d-6107-d5f88ef60dbf@fi.rohmeurope.com> <8f3963ca-ff09-b876-ae9e-433add242de2@ti.com> <331ab81e-cd42-7e9b-617a-fde4c773c07a@ti.com> <615b6fec-6c62-4a97-6d0c-d2e5a5d1ccb2@fi.rohmeurope.com> <36785ccf-57b4-eaf1-cfc0-b024857f7694@gmail.com> <40077cea-1f5e-de67-58dd-7fae0f63678d@ti.com> From: Suman Anna Message-ID: <066d9a7e-89c2-b8b5-b2cd-4993513f5a64@ti.com> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:53:12 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/21/21 5:00 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 4:54 PM Suman Anna wrote: >> >> On 9/21/21 3:29 PM, Drew Fustini wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 9:09 AM Suman Anna wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Matti, Tony, >>>> >>>> On 9/21/21 2:47 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>>>> * Matti Vaittinen [210920 08:23]: >>>>>> Finally, adding the udelay(100); (as Tony suggested) at the end of the >>>>>> omap_reset_deassert() did make the oops go away even when pruss_tm was >>>>>> enabled. I don't know what would be a proper fix though. >>>> >>>> I have been able to boot v5.15-rc1 just fine on my BBB without any additional >>>> changes [1]. >>>> >>>> May I ask what is your BBB board version? My board is rev.A5C. >>> >>> That rev is quite old [1]. Would you be able to try a Rev C? It has >>> been in production since around 2014 with the move from 2GB to 4GB >>> eMMC. >> >> I don't have any rev.C boards handy to try. >> >> I am curious to see if there is some correlation between failures and board >> versions. I see that there is a minor processor change to AM3358 from rev.B >> onwards compared to the AM3359 that I would have on my board. PRU-ICSS IP would >> be present and supported on both though. > > Rev B vs Rev C shouldn't matter.. I don't think I even have a Rev > "B".. A6A, B, to C* was done very quickly at CIrcuitCo at that time.. > > https://elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack#Revision_B > > "This version moves to the AM3358BZCZ100 processor as we are no longer > able to get the limited production version of the AM3359AZCZ100." > > I'm assuming the AM3358 had the pru enabled.. Yes, PRU-ICSS is present on AM3356 and above. regards Suman