Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp564967pxb; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:19:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUkUSR8ohDtosidjT9gQ5y6eokp5JKcxgWP4bssNn1zEYtWtXaicIbILgxIhtxcHZwwoaE X-Received: by 2002:a02:cf83:: with SMTP id w3mr3989673jar.38.1632403152517; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:19:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1632403152; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UiMDh7P9TY3Ait30I/kImfHLLgmklGFUrLPEQEfhv/hgGGhmFMv0e3TMsYvyuwrd4e FtU9leYVHz3hY/H3RjollLbyOO0vXZklVR4TlHOtNOYHl7Yo/yMntKogM/hZl8ZEIn81 wjyBmLLAHtImjbYnnLTKdh4ixuQ9KIjnlNuIdz6rZohmkIYpcq2YEtS1QSROI95Caw3r A5qk7EXXlUU2tC/V2Bg4Pn1D253K6/9bcvZCtMaPrMNsH4ivIa8HMXBCpswYoBwSpRAc wZAu+vs+rBCglZ93n+CYzObcZNGzoN/wONqwWUb9/eKyY8mdbgur9ZXTX8ZBHk/T3dwH Uhwg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=MKDfgpyx2DLaN+agqTgdGBhC7hPiB158s/GwrS6Ihlc=; b=YsRnWt3uCY5+/sQiwqi31jwT0ZOK2rrUfgZoW4HuYfgLk0Oxmtg1PCVx/UkCMwZd0k xL2Wd5fNSx1ncyQjBLZD1bmos1GuqpxwjmiDNjmM5DNHVvBCd84+GyFcr2PKflmsdyQr yk3Iy00h3584HhJirlJZ57e2rpR3+Mitpicnjp0SA7ieRdX/54+UItW2gIJ/kn6koQJT 2QX1u+ywIAtcXIQD8/FTDcDO1i3GAuqNak5OFT6LGyNXjRYCM8Sxvvw/Kq0JE2byrWkh hSvt74qLzmWz48M27nZ5tGYBie/EvOM/D7d8lQ+bW9t0HLPoTQ3vd1SfZVVkghsBP77C UclQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=ZvGSd9mM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c18si7349689iod.38.2021.09.23.06.19.00; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=ZvGSd9mM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240848AbhIWNSZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:18:25 -0400 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com ([185.125.188.122]:49304 "EHLO smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234006AbhIWNSY (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:18:24 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D79E340198 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:16:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1632403011; bh=MKDfgpyx2DLaN+agqTgdGBhC7hPiB158s/GwrS6Ihlc=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=ZvGSd9mMmXrMflx0SKK+ZcNh4hzVFVNG02AWKpxAk7qAo40N+A41qCpjW0yiCoAYt IPYSf7wtm0Bs3mvR+WDKC4z4L6RGPSRGy14LmoQjrrWbCk7RFYsKWJAWGdvUIFOGPq lhacJiEGg0Pg8b//mvU9nSH24AAyAtM54Nz2iohHYmImntEX9VyERQpviXE3Q+cUIw 6k/BcbsBi5ZBo6qZZailSSdGI+Js8sovS2660avzPZhu1fx+Kc8mRlzG3mpV+AHAbg b4owXuz/cqv9hUwaliEuO2NN/WLPC6cSl0yEMukaWgkyQMHi0rtkmplIXnBggc2vxZ mx+zItvl5bh9Q== Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id m30-20020a50999e000000b003cdd7680c8cso6746837edb.11 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:16:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MKDfgpyx2DLaN+agqTgdGBhC7hPiB158s/GwrS6Ihlc=; b=6oZcA7WJN8Z+YgP0c4Cspzsrba0midBTN/UGKBAiMERJh6GHn5RBtJUcO/KmFkXNo7 9thrK/81xTKAQwyjQW9nR9Icarv1TblutnV9Ul2+QBhdtw/LVQCZtz98LtSwvNpL/iv/ Lkutx9J98NUbO4bta5pWXLIPOcBNK1Fy+iqcPdAKnsJu/v8xxo7VaAcAAXPp8/eEwKws BNybAdGYRIPmD1Xxe4+ZSkVpnHfhvD40zqcjcGYGXnp83I9us9JETusRczx69099SiaO H3ly4TkeEaFE6z2k+bL+pcXaqmbRJWs6bmXMkpcgb2xrBG9a2RhYw5BIWH2fsaypoTfr 2mXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Pet2mq2rLcLONv1tb1iq6fzFB/bE/DiS1JCdbQQ9yjcz9dFRL umD/159Ge1arB+GTfzE8C7XtERIHs78zTPQRfFdmFm0eSH3/XZLYxDrjaxkw3gr40J9TXtuH18r G/Q8nppOPq9OogPAO069YRmFf6PsBUz1SckA0++lULzPUMR6C3qBEsAFFVw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:9d8e:: with SMTP id w14mr5339879ede.74.1632403011491; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:16:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a50:9d8e:: with SMTP id w14mr5339856ede.74.1632403011278; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:16:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210921053356.1705833-1-alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com> <28072b8e-2c32-e67d-19d3-026913c0bc7f@codethink.co.uk> In-Reply-To: From: Alexandre Ghiti Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:16:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: mfd: da9063: Add restart notifier implementation To: Ben Dooks Cc: Support Opensource , Lee Jones , linux-riscv , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 1:33 PM Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 12:25 PM Ben Dooks wrote: > > > > On 21/09/2021 06:33, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > > > The SiFive Unmatched board uses the da9063 PMIC for reset: add a restart > > > notifier that will execute a small i2c sequence allowing to reset the > > > board. > > > > > > The original implementation comes from Marcus Comstedt and Anders Montonen > > > (https://forums.sifive.com/t/reboot-command/4721/28). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti > > > > I've got a couple of comments here, mainly is this the right place > > and has anyone other than you tested. I tried something similar on > > my Unmatched and it just turned the board off. > > Someone else in the thread I mention in the commit log tried it, but > more feedback are welcome :) > > For the Unmatched, this solution will be temporary, the best place > being openSBI which lacks i2c support for now. > But I think this can be used by other boards using this PMIC. > > > > > > --- > > > drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h | 3 +++ > > > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c b/drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c > > > index df407c3afce3..c87b8d611f20 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > > +#include > > > > > > #include > > > #include > > > @@ -158,6 +159,18 @@ static int da9063_clear_fault_log(struct da9063 *da9063) > > > return ret; > > > } > > > > > > +static int da9063_restart_notify(struct notifier_block *this, > > > + unsigned long mode, void *cmd) > > > +{ > > > + struct da9063 *da9063 = container_of(this, struct da9063, restart_handler); > > > + > > > + regmap_write(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_PAGE_CON, 0x00); > > > + regmap_write(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_CONTROL_F, 0x04); > > > + regmap_write(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_CONTROL_A, 0x68); > > > + > > > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > > > +} > > > + > > > > Firstly, do you also need to force the AUTOBOOT (bit 3, CONTROL_C) > > to ensure the PMIC does restart. > > I tried this too and actually, it seems that the value is read from > OTP at reboot and as it is not set here, it has no effect. > > > > > > int da9063_device_init(struct da9063 *da9063, unsigned int irq) > > > { > > > int ret; > > > @@ -197,6 +210,18 @@ int da9063_device_init(struct da9063 *da9063, unsigned int irq) > > > } > > > } > > > > > > + da9063->restart_handler.notifier_call = da9063_restart_notify; > > > + da9063->restart_handler.priority = 128; > > > + ret = register_restart_handler(&da9063->restart_handler); > > > + if (ret) { > > > + dev_err(da9063->dev, "Failed to register restart handler\n"); > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > + > > > + devm_add_action(da9063->dev, > > > + (void (*)(void *))unregister_restart_handler, > > > + &da9063->restart_handler); > > > > there's devm_register_reboot_notifier() > > Thanks for that! Actually restart_notifier and reboot_notifier are not the same, see https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/kernel/reboot.c#L72. What we need here is restart_handler. Thanks anyway :) Alex > > > > > > > > + > > > return ret; > > > } > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h > > > index fa7a43f02f27..1b20c498e340 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h > > > @@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ struct da9063 { > > > int chip_irq; > > > unsigned int irq_base; > > > struct regmap_irq_chip_data *regmap_irq; > > > + > > > + /* Restart */ > > > + struct notifier_block restart_handler; > > > }; > > > > > > int da9063_device_init(struct da9063 *da9063, unsigned int irq); > > > > Note, the watchdog driver for the DA9063 also has a restart method > > although it also does not set the AUTOBOOT bit either. > > > > The best thing is to enable the watchdog driver, the SiFive release > > does not have either the core DA9063 or the watchdog driver for it > > enabled. > > It seems that for the restart implemented here to work, the AUTOBOOT > bit needs to be set in the OTP, which seems not to be the case with > the chip on this board: it's been discussed here > https://www.dialog-semiconductor.com/products/pmics?post_id=10052#tab-support_tab_content > (see the accepted answer). > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > > -- > > Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ > > Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius > > > > https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html