Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp581468pxb; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:36:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxumMJn87T743HoOkvZGeYVSxflokLXyi7rgEtkBNgwwZO26S+dsvbn9xCSA7aJsNv849Cd X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e85:: with SMTP id p5mr4924255ejf.159.1632404175237; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:36:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1632404175; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=orWII6WCLkQ/sNyiEpsS1gt+pfDSduOpQEHIRIGStupctuMSPo4ipB+r7Zh+hN2/a+ wWfPLORpQMEVbhxsC6rY2Vdh3ZZDmkb75bOS97agImIbTYiH0tLu+GsJrSqQ93ndbIxk q890KeWp692hQgBGWgcyqe2pYi7wrPIHjl5e97uOC+WrrmTvCYouZ3tZ0BkaWFd7OMuF qtQ5K5wkunNfI9FkvxwRbRaL2awM+Fi8w3eIpExgGzXMaY3mei/YWMZB1qZG2P6rzfr+ My0PFHcViLTwiGhkxm+lW425liwwwRd5VLzvvkia77w7/Wja9imz7wmMepKqPfT0q4RM OgTA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=F4JHNzzTaA+akHRpc87GAwuR79IlrQ12r2GLXnENAOU=; b=jm65kAMD/kluBWufEkoO33qRrups9TPQC7QXlKI9jsK4OX3NYPvCf+FSDt604PhSME ByRP6yE/6lxucgvR2RIhgfP/bzdVvpaX/guwl+porG5Aj7WqJVaLSJt3QynTjv0LDMI+ xHypE34EQ91B/XNDiuqAJIWFjE6Eq/vVljS69Yz1LDGE/pJxsWBmwEM/YzaZUcHMS/Ec zLdv6ptkYhpxkTnpMOzXdbpQ0t5CqOllPZXzjeUo+6bLpJtnzUwLKbpOqR6nwU0R2l6m ZLyKcEwhfeL8BjJ+2wxL5YskZ9he3tatpjxZy4MuY8i/dmChAcZj2bYn0Dq6ZSjC1IRc I7xg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p4si6141421ejr.151.2021.09.23.06.35.50; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241265AbhIWNes (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:34:48 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:9912 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241205AbhIWNer (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:34:47 -0400 Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4HFbbC5s8Sz8ymG; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 21:28:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggema762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.204) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 21:33:11 +0800 Received: from [10.174.176.73] (10.174.176.73) by dggema762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 21:33:10 +0800 Subject: Re: [patch v8 0/7] handle unexpected message from server To: , , , CC: , , , References: <20210916093350.1410403-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> From: "yukuai (C)" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 21:33:10 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210916093350.1410403-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.176.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggema762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.204) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/09/16 17:33, Yu Kuai wrote: Hi, jens Any interest to apply this series? Thanks, Kuai > This patch set tries to fix that client might oops if nbd server send > unexpected message to client, for example, our syzkaller report a uaf > in nbd_read_stat(): > > Call trace: > dump_backtrace+0x0/0x310 arch/arm64/kernel/time.c:78 > show_stack+0x28/0x38 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:158 > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] > dump_stack+0x144/0x1b4 lib/dump_stack.c:118 > print_address_description+0x68/0x2d0 mm/kasan/report.c:253 > kasan_report_error mm/kasan/report.c:351 [inline] > kasan_report+0x134/0x2f0 mm/kasan/report.c:409 > check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/kasan.c:260 [inline] > __asan_load4+0x88/0xb0 mm/kasan/kasan.c:699 > __read_once_size include/linux/compiler.h:193 [inline] > blk_mq_rq_state block/blk-mq.h:106 [inline] > blk_mq_request_started+0x24/0x40 block/blk-mq.c:644 > nbd_read_stat drivers/block/nbd.c:670 [inline] > recv_work+0x1bc/0x890 drivers/block/nbd.c:749 > process_one_work+0x3ec/0x9e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2147 > worker_thread+0x80/0x9d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2302 > kthread+0x1d8/0x1e0 kernel/kthread.c:255 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:1174 > > 1) At first, a normal io is submitted and completed with scheduler: > > internel_tag = blk_mq_get_tag -> get tag from sched_tags > blk_mq_rq_ctx_init > sched_tags->rq[internel_tag] = sched_tag->static_rq[internel_tag] > ... > blk_mq_get_driver_tag > __blk_mq_get_driver_tag -> get tag from tags > tags->rq[tag] = sched_tag->static_rq[internel_tag] > > So, both tags->rq[tag] and sched_tags->rq[internel_tag] are pointing > to the request: sched_tags->static_rq[internal_tag]. Even if the > io is finished. > > 2) nbd server send a reply with random tag directly: > > recv_work > nbd_read_stat > blk_mq_tag_to_rq(tags, tag) > rq = tags->rq[tag] > > 3) if the sched_tags->static_rq is freed: > > blk_mq_sched_free_requests > blk_mq_free_rqs(q->tag_set, hctx->sched_tags, i) > -> step 2) access rq before clearing rq mapping > blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(set, tags, hctx_idx); > __free_pages() -> rq is freed here > > 4) Then, nbd continue to use the freed request in nbd_read_stat() > > Changes in v8: > - add patch 5 to this series. > - modify some words. > Changes in v7: > - instead of exposing blk_queue_exit(), using percpu_ref_put() > directly. > - drop the ref right after nbd_handle_reply(). > Changes in v6: > - don't set cmd->status to error if request is completed before > nbd_clear_req(). > - get 'q_usage_counter' to prevent accessing freed request through > blk_mq_tag_to_rq(), instead of using blk_mq_find_and_get_req(). > Changes in v5: > - move patch 1 & 2 in v4 (patch 4 & 5 in v5) behind > - add some comment in patch 5 > Changes in v4: > - change the name of the patchset, since uaf is not the only problem > if server send unexpected reply message. > - instead of adding new interface, use blk_mq_find_and_get_req(). > - add patch 5 to this series > Changes in v3: > - v2 can't fix the problem thoroughly, add patch 3-4 to this series. > - modify descriptions. > - patch 5 is just a cleanup > Changes in v2: > - as Bart suggested, add a new helper function for drivers to get > request by tag. > > Yu Kuai (7): > nbd: don't handle response without a corresponding request message > nbd: make sure request completion won't concurrent > nbd: check sock index in nbd_read_stat() > nbd: don't start request if nbd_queue_rq() failed > nbd: clean up return value checking of sock_xmit() > nbd: partition nbd_read_stat() into nbd_read_reply() and > nbd_handle_reply() > nbd: fix uaf in nbd_handle_reply() > > drivers/block/nbd.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) >