Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752910AbWLOQ7o (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:59:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752913AbWLOQ7n (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:59:43 -0500 Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:29452 "EHLO rgminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752910AbWLOQ7n (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:59:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:00:37 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap To: Pavel Machek Cc: Scott Preece , kernel list Subject: Re: [PATCH/v2] CodingStyle updates Message-Id: <20061215090037.05c021af.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20061215150717.GA2345@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20061207165508.e6bf0269.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20061215120942.GA4551@ucw.cz> <4582AEC8.7030608@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20061215142206.GC2053@elf.ucw.cz> <7b69d1470612150652p609c38d2n9bff58bdb0a1edb7@mail.gmail.com> <20061215150717.GA2345@elf.ucw.cz> Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1539 Lines: 50 On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:07:17 +0100 Pavel Machek wrote: > On Fri 2006-12-15 08:52:22, Scott Preece wrote: > > On 12/15/06, Pavel Machek wrote: > > >Hi! > > > > > >> Pavel Machek wrote: > > >> >> From: Randy Dunlap > > >> >> +Use one space around (on each side of) most binary and ternary > > >operators, > > >> >> +such as any of these: > > >> >> + = + - < > * / % | & ^ <= >= == != ? : > > >> > > > >> > Actually, this should not be hard rule. We want to allow > > >> > > > >> > j = 3*i + l<<2; > > >> > > >> Which would be very misleading. This expression evaluates to > > >> > > >> j = (((3 * i) + l) << 2); > > >> > > >> Binary + precedes <<. > > > > > >Aha, okay. So this one should be written as > > > > > > j = 3*i+l << 2; > > > > > >(Well, parenthesses should really be used. Anyway, sometimes grouping > > >around operator is useful, even if I made mistake demonstrating that. > > --- > > > > I think the mistake illuminates why parentheses should be the rule. If > > you're thinking about using spacing to convey grouping, use > > parentheses instead... > > Not in simple cases. > > 3*i + 2*j should be writen like that. Not like > (3 * i) + (2 * j) I would just write it as: 3 * i + 2 * j --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/