Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp1168636pxb; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:53:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzim1K6Oc8awGJeiM/5Fp+aSHOQUb+qgmwDG9s1+rCKMszlhJwC8ayvZEwhi6PwV1N+poZu X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:40a1:: with SMTP id m33mr7280711jam.33.1632455613701; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:53:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1632455613; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=p2882Xlq+3hreThUtIcJ9IL7aT8KsfS0XntuxE9FQba5Y+6b2GU5JeYxidysJDI70x f1XK+YIxc2bSCoWSY83jXfi68KnVzmraSK3+hIk6j9z9NJJ/ohOFT1bc04LsjSa5eCID caTL1eB0YJOSgb7UgaUs1zebTYc2qrKn5gc39Rlnfazjn3sWe5IR4D41xfc13mrUS9WY 1UtjfbI+o05JRVY4lCPPzyXWQAc8y/ftfl5dSvxK5M4BhzYZWGP4FkunvnKV7gNTFuuN BgxTCpkZQ90cEMETA0vG0M/i1jvu09Dze/HMG3POn0t7Rgq6MaWivIKQ7ZleJNwyePxC 5SCw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=mvrhPdmn4zPeB4Zu7vljJZa12zagNdilCNLFsGVdf4A=; b=w5Wc+dhe9PCJx1Tmll82h5WPu/Ce6KcZrUMYiXKOD0ltvCoBOc5jCLYeYsBWEwwvRP rCec7PLhA93hVYacKW2fKRz4eW+VsK9cc/8SCSK97Y6G8i2ZMVr393g/XSS+16HoXpeU liSmHxS/PuXOrFc/aULKd4QRAjzTnYq1BBJJsUeTs3aS3XykiIbm7ZBXgFD2edH348Kh C+uRyZaGfKR4N1W7l0l0LUfYboFtVWJg3QuNnz+Inn/f+yPbV9HFOWSpqfXAjNcOvbqo iu/6iLmpOM6CgG63M4sgUkokuTsjNMvXJl68QHVgSq4tAoNjpz38Se4EGw9elmljh6P/ DE4Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mediatek.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n2si8903929ilt.29.2021.09.23.20.53.21; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:53:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mediatek.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244040AbhIXDyN (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 23:54:13 -0400 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.184]:56794 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244018AbhIXDyM (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 23:54:12 -0400 X-UUID: 4a8690e3f2044dd78a95883ff4827230-20210924 X-UUID: 4a8690e3f2044dd78a95883ff4827230-20210924 Received: from mtkexhb02.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.103)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (Generic MTA with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1719271118; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:52:38 +0800 Received: from mtkcas10.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.39) by mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:52:36 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07 (172.21.84.99) by mtkcas10.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:52:36 +0800 Message-ID: <07c5f2f1e10671bc462f88717f84aae9ee1e4d2b.camel@mediatek.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [fuse] alloc_page nofs avoid deadlock From: Ed Tsai To: Miklos Szeredi CC: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , chenguanyou , chenguanyou , "Stanley Chu =?UTF-8?Q?=28=E6=9C=B1=E5=8E=9F=E9=99=9E=29?=" Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:52:36 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20210603125242.31699-1-chenguanyou@xiaomi.com> <1fabb91167a86990f4723e9036a0e006293518f4.camel@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MTK: N Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 17:24 +0800, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 04:42, Ed Tsai wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 17:30 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 14:52, chenguanyou < > > > chenguanyou9338@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > ABA deadlock > > > > > > > > PID: 17172 TASK: ffffffc0c162c000 CPU: 6 COMMAND: "Thread-21" > > > > 0 [ffffff802d16b400] __switch_to at ffffff8008086a4c > > > > 1 [ffffff802d16b470] __schedule at ffffff80091ffe58 > > > > 2 [ffffff802d16b4d0] schedule at ffffff8009200348 > > > > 3 [ffffff802d16b4f0] bit_wait at ffffff8009201098 > > > > 4 [ffffff802d16b510] __wait_on_bit at ffffff8009200a34 > > > > 5 [ffffff802d16b5b0] inode_wait_for_writeback at > > > > ffffff800830e1e8 > > > > 6 [ffffff802d16b5e0] evict at ffffff80082fb15c > > > > 7 [ffffff802d16b620] iput at ffffff80082f9270 > > > > 8 [ffffff802d16b680] dentry_unlink_inode at ffffff80082f4c90 > > > > 9 [ffffff802d16b6a0] __dentry_kill at ffffff80082f1710 > > > > 10 [ffffff802d16b6d0] shrink_dentry_list at ffffff80082f1c34 > > > > 11 [ffffff802d16b750] prune_dcache_sb at ffffff80082f18a8 > > > > 12 [ffffff802d16b770] super_cache_scan at ffffff80082d55ac > > > > 13 [ffffff802d16b860] shrink_slab at ffffff8008266170 > > > > 14 [ffffff802d16b900] shrink_node at ffffff800826b420 > > > > 15 [ffffff802d16b980] do_try_to_free_pages at ffffff8008268460 > > > > 16 [ffffff802d16ba60] try_to_free_pages at ffffff80082680d0 > > > > 17 [ffffff802d16bbe0] __alloc_pages_nodemask at > > > > ffffff8008256514 > > > > 18 [ffffff802d16bc60] fuse_copy_fill at ffffff8008438268 > > > > 19 [ffffff802d16bd00] fuse_dev_do_read at ffffff8008437654 > > > > 20 [ffffff802d16bdc0] fuse_dev_splice_read at ffffff8008436f40 > > > > 21 [ffffff802d16be60] sys_splice at ffffff8008315d18 > > > > 22 [ffffff802d16bff0] __sys_trace at ffffff8008084014 > > > > > > > > PID: 9652 TASK: ffffffc0c9ce0000 CPU: 4 COMMAND: > > > > "kworker/u16:8" > > > > 0 [ffffff802e793650] __switch_to at ffffff8008086a4c > > > > 1 [ffffff802e7936c0] __schedule at ffffff80091ffe58 > > > > 2 [ffffff802e793720] schedule at ffffff8009200348 > > > > 3 [ffffff802e793770] __fuse_request_send at ffffff8008435760 > > > > 4 [ffffff802e7937b0] fuse_simple_request at ffffff8008435b14 > > > > 5 [ffffff802e793930] fuse_flush_times at ffffff800843a7a0 > > > > 6 [ffffff802e793950] fuse_write_inode at ffffff800843e4dc > > > > 7 [ffffff802e793980] __writeback_single_inode at > > > > ffffff8008312740 > > > > 8 [ffffff802e793aa0] writeback_sb_inodes at ffffff80083117e4 > > > > 9 [ffffff802e793b00] __writeback_inodes_wb at ffffff8008311d98 > > > > 10 [ffffff802e793c00] wb_writeback at ffffff8008310cfc > > > > 11 [ffffff802e793d00] wb_workfn at ffffff800830e4a8 > > > > 12 [ffffff802e793d90] process_one_work at ffffff80080e4fac > > > > 13 [ffffff802e793e00] worker_thread at ffffff80080e5670 > > > > 14 [ffffff802e793e60] kthread at ffffff80080eb650 > > > > > > The issue is real. > > > > > > The fix, however, is not the right one. The fundamental problem > > > is > > > that fuse_write_inode() blocks on a request to userspace. > > > > > > This is the same issue that fuse_writepage/fuse_writepages > > > face. In > > > that case the solution was to copy the page contents to a > > > temporary > > > buffer and return immediately as if the writeback already > > > completed. > > > > > > Something similar needs to be done here: send the FUSE_SETATTR > > > request > > > asynchronously and return immediately from > > > fuse_write_inode(). The > > > tricky part is to make sure that multiple time updates for the > > > same > > > inode aren't mixed up... > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Miklos > > > > Dear Szeredi, > > > > Writeback thread calls fuse_write_inode() and wait for user Daemon > > to > > complete this write inode request. The user daemon will > > alloc_page() > > after taking this request, and a deadlock could happen when we try > > to > > shrink dentry list under memory pressure. > > > > We (Mediatek) glad to work on this issue for mainline and also LTS. > > So > > another problem is that we should not change the protocol or > > feature > > for stable kernel. > > > > Use GFP_NOFS | __GFP_HIGHMEM can really avoid this by skip the > > dentry > > shirnker. It works but degrade the alloc_page success rate. In a > > more > > fundamental way, we could cache the contents and return > > immediately. > > But how to ensure the request will be done successfully, e.g., > > always > > retry if it fails from daemon. > > Key is where the the dirty metadata is flushed. To prevent deadlock > it must not be flushed from memory reclaim, so must make sure that it > is flushed on close(2) and munmap(2) and not dirtied after that. > > I'm working on this currently and hope to get it ready for the next > merge window. > > Thanks, > Miklos Hi Miklos, I'm not sure whether it has already been resolved in mainline. If it still WIP, please cc me on future emails. Best regards, Ed Tsai