Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753306AbWLOU2r (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:28:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753334AbWLOU2q (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:28:46 -0500 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:17964 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753306AbWLOU2q convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:28:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:26:59 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: Pavel Machek , Scott Preece , kernel list Subject: Re: [PATCH/v2] CodingStyle updates Message-Id: <20061215122659.ebccdede.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20061215201127.GA32210@lazybastard.org> References: <20061207165508.e6bf0269.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20061215120942.GA4551@ucw.cz> <4582AEC8.7030608@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20061215142206.GC2053@elf.ucw.cz> <7b69d1470612150652p609c38d2n9bff58bdb0a1edb7@mail.gmail.com> <20061215150717.GA2345@elf.ucw.cz> <20061215090037.05c021af.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20061215201127.GA32210@lazybastard.org> Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1267 Lines: 41 On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:11:27 +0000 J?rn Engel wrote: > On Fri, 15 December 2006 09:00:37 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:07:17 +0100 Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > Not in simple cases. > > > > > > 3*i + 2*j should be writen like that. Not like > > > (3 * i) + (2 * j) > > > > I would just write it as: > > 3 * i + 2 * j > > So would I. But I definitely wouldn't write > for (i = 0; i < 10; i += 2) I would and do (the above). > because I prefer the grouping in > for (i=0; i<10; i+=2) > > Pavel may have picked a bad example, but there are cases when spaces can > be used to group code. Just as empty lines can be used to group code. > And in both cases the reason should be "readability". Agreed. > Which variant is the most readable is a highly personal matter and may > alos change over time for any group of people. I'd vote against a stone > tablet with 10 commandments of taste. "Make it readable, use common > sense" is so much better, imo. then send patches :) --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/