Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 10:15:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 10:15:06 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:11782 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 10:14:48 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 16:14:36 +0100 From: Jan Hubicka To: Momchil Velikov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: i386 flags register clober in inline assembly Message-ID: <20011117161436.B23331@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <87y9l58pb5.fsf@fadata.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y9l58pb5.fsf@fadata.bg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > There are several inline assembly routines in the i386 port, which > clobber the flags register, nevertheless fail to declare that. > E.g. atomic_inc > > __asm__ __volatile__( > LOCK "incl %0" > :"=m" (v->counter) > :"m" (v->counter)); > > should be > > __asm__ __volatile__( > LOCK "incl %0" > :"=m" (v->counter) > :"m" (v->counter) > : "cc"); > > since "incl" clobbers flags. > > Any ideas if these functions should be corrected ? They don't need to be. On i386, the flags are (partly for historical reasons) clobbered by default. > > Although gcc documentation says "cc" has no effect on some machines, > it seems this is not the case with i386, judging from the "(set (reg:CC 17) ..." > and "(clobber (reg:CC 17))" in i386.md. i386.md does add the clobber to each asm statement. Honza > > Regards, > -velco > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/