Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964889AbWLOU4v (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:56:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964893AbWLOU4v (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:56:51 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]:58974 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964889AbWLOU4u convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:56:50 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EzTUAF5obm79NEQQSskU/NPvSeSHJRlg88ljlB5MnSXK5YL43pEr96/2aIo9MF3/4FxxWuLCv9W50Z82W1zpi91bGG8sS0GCH99cJjunAF9ZkqQCUbCDvWwxH71PXKhraKrBNcK/pmVTaOaDbZOaONe9mOutof4QQ1irwAnPINg= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:56:46 -0500 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?=" Subject: Re: [PATCH/v2] CodingStyle updates Cc: "Randy Dunlap" , "Pavel Machek" , "Scott Preece" , "kernel list" In-Reply-To: <20061215201127.GA32210@lazybastard.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061207165508.e6bf0269.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20061215120942.GA4551@ucw.cz> <4582AEC8.7030608@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20061215142206.GC2053@elf.ucw.cz> <7b69d1470612150652p609c38d2n9bff58bdb0a1edb7@mail.gmail.com> <20061215150717.GA2345@elf.ucw.cz> <20061215090037.05c021af.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20061215201127.GA32210@lazybastard.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 912 Lines: 32 On 12/15/06, J?rn Engel wrote: > On Fri, 15 December 2006 09:00:37 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:07:17 +0100 Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > Not in simple cases. > > > > > > 3*i + 2*j should be writen like that. Not like > > > (3 * i) + (2 * j) > > > > I would just write it as: > > 3 * i + 2 * j > > So would I. But I definitely wouldn't write > for (i = 0; i < 10; i += 2) > because I prefer the grouping in > for (i=0; i<10; i+=2) > Would you write: i+=2; outside the loop? If not then it is better to keep style consistent and not use condensed form in loops either. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/