Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030206AbWLOWZJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:25:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030214AbWLOWZJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:25:09 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:39810 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030206AbWLOWZE (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:25:04 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm] Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:27:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Alan , Andrew Morton , Neil Brown , Jurriaan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo References: <20061204203410.6152efec.akpm@osdl.org> <20061215220618.06f1873c@localhost.localdomain> <45831F80.5060008@garzik.org> In-Reply-To: <45831F80.5060008@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612152327.25706.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1451 Lines: 40 On Friday, 15 December 2006 23:19, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Alan wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:39:27 -0800 > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800 > >> Andrew Morton wrote: > >> > >>> Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single time > >>> and I shall then drop the lot. So please don't flub them. > >>> > >>> I'll then do a rc1-mm2 without them. > >> hm, this is looking like a lot of work for not much gain. Rafael, are > >> you able to do a quick chop and tell us whether these: > > > > The md one and the long history of reports about parallel I/O causing > > problems sounds a lot more like the kmap stuff you were worried about > > Andrew. I'd be very intereste dto know if it happens on x86_32 built with > > a standard memory split and no highmem.... > > 2.6.20-rc1 works, and 2.6.20-rc1 does not have the kmap_atomic() fix. > > Upstream does kmap_atomic(KM_USER0) and -mm does kmap_atomic(KM_IRQ0) On x86_64 that shouldn't be a problem, I think, and my machine is an x86_64 one. Greetings, Rafael -- If you don't have the time to read, you don't have the time or the tools to write. - Stephen King - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/