Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Reply-To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:55:19 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20210925005528.1145584-1-seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210925005528.1145584-6-seanjc@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20210925005528.1145584-1-seanjc@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/14] KVM: s390: Clear valid_wakeup in kvm_s390_handle_wait(),
 not in arch hook
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc:     James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
        Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Move the clearing of valid_wakeup out of kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish() so
that a future patch can drop said arch hook.  Unlike the other blocking-
related arch hooks (vcpu_blocking/unblocking()), vcpu_block_finish() needs
to be called even if the KVM doesn't actually block the vCPU.  This will
allow future patches to differentiate between truly blocking the vCPU and
emulating a halt condition without introducing a contradiction.

Alternatively, the hook could be renamed to kvm_arch_vcpu_halt_finish(),
but there's literally one call site in s390, and future cleanup can also
be done to handle valid_wakeup fully within kvm_s390_handle_wait() and
allow generic KVM to drop vcpu_valid_wakeup().

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 1 +
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c  | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index 10722455fd02..520450a7956f 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -1336,6 +1336,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_wait(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 no_timer:
 	srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
 	kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
+	vcpu->valid_wakeup = false;
 	__unset_cpu_idle(vcpu);
 	vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
 
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 7cabe6778b1b..08ed68639a21 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -5082,7 +5082,7 @@ static inline unsigned long nonhyp_mask(int i)
 
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	vcpu->valid_wakeup = false;
+
 }
 
 static int __init kvm_s390_init(void)
-- 
2.33.0.685.g46640cef36-goog