Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp2184982pxb; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 23:48:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4jcRrqI+vb0QB9aiFVt2kciCCOLj6J5U7FxGF6EKqk1KqJuDhyCtscBV+4F+XgcKKYsN+ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c459:: with SMTP id n25mr9585219edr.29.1632552485400; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 23:48:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1632552485; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LKWTh7kFnR4EytgukTSmEAsoCvuBTiUbLg4qsJ0YWNvefjMrRWkeGrwo/wIpvIyV+/ dMqMKy7ZgNJMMsoJs/J7Kwg43pneeVRGyrF7YCn/4qTiFPJY4Vnrip8541ty3hXM5Asz x97sH6+6PAsAkAXE2frKBcxzB2GjEaDP1G7Yv4enAUP++3NWRrwj6+eaeZbay77J7lm5 0r8W4AzNqou8Kgr21kN6ZJl2q0/eMmakPDExOa99wtrqTHtfVL8nlTtEuKgpiC0sWjlT xpy3MOXMLTlFQ/h6R14oEv43nwmg2iO3sXx8lvvNzA+Nws2apEzc9ot+PxyEzFioIrQ1 WAJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=KUE5uliHgQSz+W6OoczSy6j/pQcC1fX9twvbX7G/f9A=; b=v8ZQ6Ivgh2qlP3K7SXDIH0aABJ8HbcBiTf6j+KdEaNW6X9Yw8E9eAx35S7SuyApzoQ mCNs5ZftVM3575ipYn5GGnTJDKmyyndq6HN9POYGqLmrDi61V8zpfWPN7orCytuM0EtW iZf2gLD/qO96u8qXuMWKnwTXR/buhMUrSuRgEaz6rRizWKXeIgWW+OL93YJeEIjElRJs lbUpvO5vnZidIZ6cZXhP63m2UiuA0mpr4WrVhYCdoMnH1UtYoJ6IEcRc5+Vw/+zI8Aek 4rc7Co/3rhPCWUQr19x4WQeCuGtQvI4kUMN1t2Dbzwz78dccX0+Be1I1WN32+rn1Ph32 ldoQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=RzG5JAXj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j5si11139250ejm.413.2021.09.24.23.47.42; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 23:48:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=RzG5JAXj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347300AbhIYCSU (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 Sep 2021 22:18:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57976 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343760AbhIYCST (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Sep 2021 22:18:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2BA0C061571; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 19:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id w19so10407652pfn.12; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 19:16:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=KUE5uliHgQSz+W6OoczSy6j/pQcC1fX9twvbX7G/f9A=; b=RzG5JAXjYeb25XGQTSaj998+yrmmkOU8udleo9PeOjjULMZwsV7c3+ev4kIIYNW97R KBweX8EZeU0XeFblZ7Xolw+z3yNqfv1XsHAGBDrCotscfieM431chguBIzTY2axLiDG/ GYB5unJeMUwoj5Y+fP65PqVK0qKez0k6Lphy4zgeDjXFSyzfRA9w8jBBW1CviB2FXFpH hRYJBkkzAZs0nmvHNXg+DO1rlR9Ou8NpSG36XugeVupxE9ITaGIpdABlsRQVD+4LkMCE +s79tHe1Hg+JZcAEXgGxnkNqDphiKl17xpnUMyPWV6s1MavImb+3hglLdja6yipQ6OM7 T0Bg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=KUE5uliHgQSz+W6OoczSy6j/pQcC1fX9twvbX7G/f9A=; b=RVG58enSJWJkEPLXRKrSo0yW8Wr8Ym3XWtKs5Ry/GqOeydF6nb5hI7hqOxUvgx4AZW 6S/DQnLKSnkeDFNXADTQHFwYFAfmncWu3Hyu6W4VgJ8YpfXV3w9Lqrac+zo2Z7jFbMXT ey6QkjsSSs/1zFYWwaBxXmHWQElJcvqM96ZEouLL1aQkGk4ZTqQ1nwpndefzETqGCb3V +EuAZCVXvPaoiKwgDjgVUOD2266CztEhhtlcxo+tgjdRkI0JSrxzblDJsVNxLWgb5pKN IWu41Fnk4LKsULWOBqHdzwpyxIzfy+awh30mh2I9v62CXm5pgvd+aUtF1ItS31i0ZRwc E6tA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530x92XVBdGE9x4+t1wKQIvmVyCmxEicLUSmlMttEw6hwshJer8P YCqve4/nx8tyKVAPuOK6uqE= X-Received: by 2002:a63:1f10:: with SMTP id f16mr6284338pgf.423.1632536205017; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 19:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nuc10 (d50-92-229-34.bchsia.telus.net. [50.92.229.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x21sm10249866pfa.186.2021.09.24.19.16.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Sep 2021 19:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 19:16:42 -0700 From: Rustam Kovhaev To: Dave Chinner Cc: Eric Sandeen , Fengfei Xi , darrick.wong@oracle.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tian.xianting@h3c.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix system crash caused by null bp->b_pages Message-ID: References: <20201224095142.7201-1-xi.fengfei@h3c.com> <63d75865-84c6-0f76-81a2-058f4cad1d84@sandeen.net> <20210922014804.GQ1756565@dread.disaster.area> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210922014804.GQ1756565@dread.disaster.area> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dave, On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:48:04AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 03:48:13PM -0700, Rustam Kovhaev wrote: > > Hi Fengfei, Eric, > > > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 01:35:32PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > On 12/24/20 3:51 AM, Fengfei Xi wrote: > > > > We have encountered the following problems several times: > > > > 1、A raid slot or hardware problem causes block device loss. > > > > 2、Continue to issue IO requests to the problematic block device. > > > > 3、The system possibly crash after a few hours. > > > > > > What kernel is this on? > > > > > > > I have a customer that recently hit this issue on 4.12.14-122.74 > > SLE12-SP5 kernel. > > I think need to engage SuSE support and engineering, then, as this > is not a kernel supported by upstream devs. I'd be saying the same > thing if this was an RHEL frankenkernel, too. > roger that, should not be a problem, thank you!