Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753578AbWLPJWu (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:22:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753580AbWLPJWu (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:22:50 -0500 Received: from bld-mail01.adl2.internode.on.net ([203.16.214.65]:40944 "EHLO mail.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753578AbWLPJWt (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:22:49 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 913 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:22:49 EST From: Marek Wawrzyczny To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Binary Drivers Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:07:31 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612162007.32110.marekw1977@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2250 Lines: 46 Dear Linux Kernel ML, I am writing as a Linux-only user of over 2 years to express my concern with the recent proposal to block out closed source modules from the kernel. While, I understand and share your sentiments over open source software and drivers. I fear however, that trying to steamroll the industry into developing open source drivers by banning closed source drivers is going to have a completely different result. They will simply abandon Linux support for some of their products altogether. Take the high-end graphic cards that are prevalent in most of today's home/SOHO hardware- desktops and laptops. Would I be wrong in saying that the Linux market share in this market is no more than 5%? These companies have already demonstrated that the support they provide is proportional to the market share. The open source driver development is promising but it has been mentioned several times that the project is undermanned and the vendors are not forthcoming with the necessary information. My hardware as it stands today is still not working with the open-source drivers. Perhaps this is the case of PEBCAK and not the open-source drivers per se but with a 1-4 hour turnaround to test a new version of the r300 driver it is not a small effort on my part. Still, I'm eagerly awaiting the day that I'll be able to use an open-source driver that is on par with the ati one. The bottom line is that the proposed 1st Jan 2008 dead line is unlikely to make any corporations tremble. It is likely to be the day when I will be no longer able to run the latest version of the kernel. Finally, I'd like to thank you for reading my email and on your work on the fantastic work and community that Linux is. I hope you will take this user and others like me under consideration when making the final decision on whether or not to include the proposed patch and whether to undertake work on code that will prevent binary drivers from loading. Warmest regards, Marek Wawrzyczny - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/