Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161036AbWLPPPS (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:15:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161043AbWLPPPS (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:15:18 -0500 Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.46]:44173 "EHLO vms046pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161036AbWLPPPQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:15:16 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:15:08 -0500 From: Gene Heskett Subject: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19] In-reply-to: <200612161128.27721.rjw@sisk.pl> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Willy Tarreau , Linus Torvalds , karderio Message-id: <200612161015.08355.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Organization: Not detectable MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <1166226982.12721.78.camel@localhost> <20061216064344.GF24090@1wt.eu> <200612161128.27721.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3573 Lines: 75 On Saturday 16 December 2006 05:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >On Saturday, 16 December 2006 07:43, Willy Tarreau wrote: [...] >I think the most important problem with the binary-only drivers is that > we can't support their users _at_ _all_, but some of them expect us to > support them somehow. > >So, why don't we make an official statement, like something that will > appear on the front page of www.kernel.org, that the users of > binary-only drivers will never get any support from us? That would > make things crystal clear. > >Greetings, >Rafael I disagree with this, to the extent that I perceive this business of no support for a 'tainted' kernel to be almost in the same category as saying that if we configure and build our own kernels, then we are alone and you don't want to hear about it. Yes, there is a rather large difference in actual fact, but if I come to the list with a firewire or usb problem, we should be capable of divorcing the fact that I may also be using an ati or nvidia supplied driver from the firewire or usb problem at hand. I am not in fact using the ati driver with my 9200SE, as the in-kernel as its plenty good enough for that I do, but that's the point. To automaticly deny supplying what might be helpfull suggestions just because the user has a 'tainted' kernel strikes me as being pretty darned hypocritical, particularly when the user states he has reverted but this instant problem persists. Yes, there have been bad drivers, but they are generally rather quickly known about, and replaced with newer versions in short order if problems of a fixed pattern are known to occur with version xyz of the nvidia stuff. small rant: Ati's track record is not so stellar in terms of timely fixes, but from comments I see, their support may be getting better, but IMO the main support we see is from their PR people announcing yet another linux driver project we rarely see the output of while the card itself is still in production. I've been burnt there, twice now, once I even bought linux drivers from a 3rd party & took a bath on that too, wanting to use such and such a card, waiting till we had a driver for that card, then going after the card only to find it doesn't work, they've replaced the card with a new, completely incompatible version without changing anything on the box, and only the windows cd and the actual card in the box. That's just plain criminal, that box should be carrying at least a new part number so the buyer can make an intelligent choice. /rant But those are *my* problems and I'm a big boy now. I just want to point out that this 'tainted' business, while 90% politically driven, is a huge turnoff for the Joe Sixpacks looking to get the M$ shaft out of an orifice normally used for other things. I also have witnessed more of this argument, which seems to occur at monthly intervals, than I care to. This is not productive use of anyones time. And I've now contributed to the noise so I'll SU... -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/