Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932518AbWLPSjj (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:39:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932558AbWLPSji (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:39:38 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:53913 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932518AbWLPSji (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:39:38 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:38:53 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , clameter@engr.sgi.com, apw@shadowen.org, Andrew Morton , heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, bob.picco@hp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2] In-Reply-To: <20061216173136.fbc91fa6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20061216173136.fbc91fa6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 427 Lines: 11 On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > By this, we'll not access mem_section[] in usual ops. Why do we need mem_section? We have a page table that fulfills the same role. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/