Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp3784888pxb; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 02:28:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7kihHbPb68K1RDuxYNABEXp3qcjCe3imPkvsOXxQeBv8teMj73IXxPkytefmsSNvMmy8t X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9e49:0:b0:44b:2a06:715e with SMTP id z9-20020aa79e49000000b0044b2a06715emr22530252pfq.78.1632734884777; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 02:28:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1632734884; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TkspRnDXaN0BMqFYo/ojv4hycML+6yGO7Cv2R6B6QXnSwL8OaYBC3L9zY1lf8P8e0u n9d9lIk0mFLd6lUpXmZ3gJdi2aq4M0s0Pjsi30yJvbfCi/C91/c2igXNiD4bFwFU0DWh jXDRalAMa42DEqQx6qd6UoK8v6Yr0FjwIGr8K+GVJ24TyzCMmz90bAOmBJ8BjVd7Zflu 5x9TVGCx6WIQE1v/sEjxV4PER2QsuCVhcJZP4iHrWK9TySgilYGlPFNSBNMWrLpqL87F vvb53+CyceTKXvq5dwpcxGFkTa8oHnX88+zgrzEfXDVMZBhy2SrDUtkiDSZUE5g/B0+y xq4g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=o8jThrmo0nFh3G8H1yEp6CaUd2Is+ZV2Wqa41t50MPk=; b=DGwRd86QYUB1j4jbShHJn/6xiXk4nd8vuAAlYVAOLK6i6on1AiSQXR2bhBGOhlRRtr 03oOZAHTkVQi07T4fp72aQbaZCjQQ/ztrQ8+XWkxZLtZ0iowDJMNc0hpYfqgKf2SDVu+ Rlk2n7pzrv1zharAnT0PLF51gbLVWil8mbJHg/8WoL3y27UW7towOb1ztqT9bcbzUIVY InZaEQo5QVwuhW/o6kn0MRq5PPAXe6qjXHCVVNlsEHfdYpqxwsM0gAkgkkQ29Oq2Rfya c0kQSC3WUwWBU3Z1XR3ysblllPZ/TaLPuXsnr7zFGSzbWaRUWM2X1B2ysox9VKmtrL9o xx7g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="D9FD/0Lu"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o22si20086937pfu.175.2021.09.27.02.27.52; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 02:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="D9FD/0Lu"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233678AbhI0J2Y (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 05:28:24 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:39558 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233663AbhI0J2W (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 05:28:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1632734805; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=o8jThrmo0nFh3G8H1yEp6CaUd2Is+ZV2Wqa41t50MPk=; b=D9FD/0LuEvWGt64nRzpj18B5lYACofavEoKtSx+Fz0Zjdyl4j3AI8+GqtxNb69g+Vk28Ys fQoCIY5Q2dwswzfG8wJw+xAEvUnSHIq8oZGV7+YcpvvbuGShwM1ACnWS6e9PylFM2anXVB RbqBmq867tSJi9Cm02uy7thkeX22NoE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-343-lOCmrL1JMCCkKwpSynLsFA-1; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 05:26:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: lOCmrL1JMCCkKwpSynLsFA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 775B01023F4D; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from T590 (ovpn-8-37.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.8.37]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30A2D19724; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:26:30 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: John Garry Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/13] blk-mq: Use shared tags for shared sbitmap support Message-ID: References: <1632472110-244938-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1632472110-244938-13-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <6f52adfd-6904-6efb-adfc-f5f20eb5c1cf@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6f52adfd-6904-6efb-adfc-f5f20eb5c1cf@huawei.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:13:29AM +0100, John Garry wrote: > On 26/09/2021 04:25, Ming Lei wrote: > > > c > > > @@ -27,10 +27,11 @@ bool __blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) > > > if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(hctx->flags)) { > > > struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue; > > > struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set; > > > + struct blk_mq_tags *tags = set->shared_sbitmap_tags; > > The local variable of 'set' can be removed and just retrieve 'tags' from > > hctx->tags. > > > > > if (!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE, &q->queue_flags) && > > > !test_and_set_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE, &q->queue_flags)) > > > - atomic_inc(&set->active_queues_shared_sbitmap); > > > + atomic_inc(&tags->active_queues); > > > } else { > > > if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state) && > > > !test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state)) > > > @@ -61,10 +62,12 @@ void __blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) > > > struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set; > > > if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(hctx->flags)) { > > > + struct blk_mq_tags *tags = set->shared_sbitmap_tags; > > > + > > Same with above. > > ok > > > > > > if (!test_and_clear_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE, > > > &q->queue_flags)) > > > return; > > > - atomic_dec(&set->active_queues_shared_sbitmap); > > > + atomic_dec(&tags->active_queues); > > > } else { > > > if (!test_and_clear_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state)) > > > return; > > > @@ -510,38 +513,10 @@ static int blk_mq_init_bitmap_tags(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, > > > return 0; > > > } > > ... > > > > - struct sbitmap_queue __bitmap_tags; > > > - struct sbitmap_queue __breserved_tags; > > > struct blk_mq_tags **tags; > > > + struct blk_mq_tags *shared_sbitmap_tags; > > > + > > > struct mutex tag_list_lock; > > > struct list_head tag_list; > > > }; > > > @@ -432,6 +429,8 @@ enum { > > > ((policy & ((1 << BLK_MQ_F_ALLOC_POLICY_BITS) - 1)) \ > > > << BLK_MQ_F_ALLOC_POLICY_START_BIT) > > > +#define BLK_MQ_NO_HCTX_IDX (-1U) > > > + > > > struct gendisk *__blk_mq_alloc_disk(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, void *queuedata, > > > struct lock_class_key *lkclass); > > > #define blk_mq_alloc_disk(set, queuedata) \ > > > diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h > > > index 4baf9435232d..17e50e5ef47b 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h > > > @@ -459,8 +459,7 @@ struct request_queue { > > > atomic_t nr_active_requests_shared_sbitmap; > > > - struct sbitmap_queue sched_bitmap_tags; > > > - struct sbitmap_queue sched_breserved_tags; > > > + struct blk_mq_tags *shared_sbitmap_tags; > > Maybe better with shared_sched_sbitmap_tags or sched_sbitmap_tags? > > Yeah, I suppose I should add "sched" to the name, as before. > > BTW, Do you think that I should just change shared_sbitmap -> shared_tags > naming now globally? I'm thinking now that I should... Yeah, I think so, but seems you preferred to the name of shared sbitmap, so I did't mention that, :-) Thanks, Ming