Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp4090463pxb; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:11:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQFJLzdkJ1zeYDuOfbc6LMwCE6NUASaiNfq0qBeMGuzE0VBt0tODaIB8UW7e/rr4GuxVvU X-Received: by 2002:a50:bf46:: with SMTP id g6mr857451edk.182.1632759113265; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:11:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1632759113; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SFK2JgQ94aiAYQ55+KgSDi44ZNjVyL1WmgsvpZIYTRLL6dl39FBpP0bBjyFgPhh3Ut /qtIhCz/Cw4yv4bPEFWVZ4EnQJP8E+2lTJpTPs9rrghtt4zNwdcovnVvWaO8j+A96VsJ A996UksWMaxdJjqBrXKI3m0LwNdHHc2+R70EmYmwB2XJ88KaeGGZOjVpi9xG8bteR0Cy Dw94JklMewmJQDK58G58WM/HCEHjoySNmVlKDMSe8elOGh6zAHVWyf2AceDD+IKPthnN Uy0FuY5CFC63QktpD/XKwScR5xmFW8dq6eLh+H6KCyBYqQ0Ip3785nQA2qw4Xg171Atz 2bjg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=2GQ/4yVo5M6uC3IK/BIrMcprTNmZ6x0QiXuUrYuvaGQ=; b=wvtrITmEu/rwWCbgHHDx2zwuO1bfxc4M1wDXZlJAeTjEkm6Prmt2CYOEbw4ZJXtr0i WW0Mo6Xowzt9PfMD2R8KHfTIsIQ9bdRN9ari4ZM/O1zpwl3UT8DwjxKNHdnH26vlZVKf IxfQ7qJRGY6NKXtv+i4OVTl8bWfFrKkmDc7Vqd6snjEEIQuOH+9WnWMvdiihKaSellU2 aX9qWGjx96zYeBxSS9vv6X8njBblO7zLL5t8lfQtnZtvWZbbaTsklcfSLbADom8yaFH0 0pEm9cGwgisuUq4TGyTIJN95PaC5g8w0Ll5w2nofaMHhg3njOW9ej7/BHU2LJ/oxnbuy gIuA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=fvYVIROg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m29si5217674ejn.203.2021.09.27.09.11.28; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=fvYVIROg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235286AbhI0QLg (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:11:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53162 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235305AbhI0QLg (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:11:36 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 423BEC061575 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:09:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id d18so23366668iof.13 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:09:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2GQ/4yVo5M6uC3IK/BIrMcprTNmZ6x0QiXuUrYuvaGQ=; b=fvYVIROgMYloEMngAaoX++4PKLGL4I2Y6ORD7LIBRQ4TqPvpXEH02N1pz7M2Neokis 3qmzHiem+1W3OryQkA9+ZA+YyOchpW5Rd5FMeYPXfOonp8QTbHG48R0EtbzjEhjZdw3j MStsGq02w6aP5HFKVSJXxwKxYK/xq38+M9t9LPxAftVQ1r0T4idsE3JDePie7/l0qYvl G3Jr1NO2CMKU2YYX9G70Xfa6MC16r+KxHX7tgEqb92HEOEpxuOAlDKxisFD8QgR5vRfo rNGHyFfm1gFba2uyuXeVBw4h/+4bjtNk5OyMmuPPq2coY1rc5V0svaB4X/fvyf2vZcjX 9A8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2GQ/4yVo5M6uC3IK/BIrMcprTNmZ6x0QiXuUrYuvaGQ=; b=hSiLeeXSWSkvxoZwfrQ9Z6Sz9rbrvMX9LwE9M27r6pd2PFsxOyT1JULrVI2Y6rbMGI 7hQfSO+DTlucV/rREMQBeiO9scvLnQbpmL2pPfSZ/jgxuxYjlU19eOPqXsw04b8CEVXj XW3wExCbJCpKv3kqigctG6OVR7pGSbmMmCAVFf6rYgliZgPdihvAAbryMjj8ppUBdPRT aj+usaF/R+1BNga0lOP1ugwHKEtushG3LUpxJ13vDGlbZL7YWUII3FaD94hEUu7s7KcC 4Ul2eyYtJ1DyMfDpMWbZjIKi+2atisgagkF0X05K+l1utmv0KpDeElpkPxFNvoKhx4KT +9cA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GlfOBOyiNjnxfDKtLMtWZA0OFXL6uRFOotAWPkWR0SCd/0X+U /FMn7Downto6h0dUMoNJyNecUqiZJ5gxwULCgSfk6w== X-Received: by 2002:a02:8790:: with SMTP id t16mr666255jai.14.1632758997457; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:09:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210922081959.390059-1-irogers@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ian Rogers Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:09:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Start aligning perf test with kunit style To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Namhyung Kim , Jin Yao , John Garry , "Paul A . Clarke" , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Brendan Higgins , Daniel Latypov , David Gow , eranian@google.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 2:25 PM Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 04:36:05PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 2:55 PM Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 01:19:53AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > Perf test uses its own structs and code layout that differs from kunit > > > > that was more recently introduced to the kernel. Besides consistency, > > > > it is hoped that moving in the direction of kunit style will enable > > > > reuse of infrastructure like test output formatting for continuous > > > > testing systems. For example: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CA+GJov6tdjvY9x12JsJT14qn6c7NViJxqaJk+r-K1YJzPggFDQ@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > > > > > The motivation for this restructuring comes from wanting to be able to > > > > tag tests with a size: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/CAP-5=fWmGyuqFKc-EMP3rbmTkjZ3MS+YSajGZfeRMc38HS82gw@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > To have more exhaustive and slower running tests. This isn't > > > > something kunit currently supports, nor is the execution of python and > > > > shell tests, but it seems sensible to work on an approach with kunit > > > > rather to invent a new wheel inside of perf. > > > > > > > > These initial patches are just refactoring the main test suite > > > > definitions to be in a more kunit style. Kunit isn't depended upon, it > > > > is hoped that this can be done in later patches for the sake of > > > > consistency. > > > > > > seems good.. how far away from kunit is the code now? > > > > Thanks Jiri, It is a ways away from complete. I was thinking to follow up with: > > * Migrate the current sub-test approach to use kunit style test cases > > within a suite. > > * Combine what are currently independent test suites into one test > > suite with different test cases, for example stat.c contains stat, > > stat_config and stat_round tests. > > > > Once this is done then to unify with kunit we need to work out a > > common pattern for skipping a test, etc. There's already a lot here > > and so I wanted to get an opinion before pushing along further. > > > > > > > > > > v1. Built/tested on x86. > > > > > > > > Ian Rogers (5): > > > > perf test: Use macro for "suite" declarations > > > > perf test: Use macro for "suite" definitions > > > > perf test: Make each test/suite its own struct. > > > > perf test: Move each test suite struct to its test > > > > perf test: Rename struct test to test_suite > > > > > > > > tools/perf/arch/arm/include/arch-tests.h | 2 +- > > > > tools/perf/arch/arm/tests/arch-tests.c | 21 +- > > > > tools/perf/arch/arm/tests/vectors-page.c | 2 +- > > > > tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/arch-tests.h | 2 +- > > > > tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/arch-tests.c | 15 +- > > > > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/arch-tests.h | 2 +- > > > > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/tests/arch-tests.c | 15 +- > > > > > > I can run/test this on ppc/arm if you don't have any > > > > I have pretty easy access to ARM but lost access to PowerPC. If we're > > happy with the direction then I can test ARM and ask for help on > > PowerPC. > > it compiles fine on powerpc and failed tests seem reasonable, > before/after perf test output is same apart from this: > > [root@ibm-p9z-06-lp7 perf]# diff -puw out.old out.new > --- out.old 2021-09-26 17:15:57.947807813 -0400 > +++ out.new 2021-09-26 17:20:51.789918644 -0400 > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ > 69: PE file support : Ok > 70: Event expansion for cgroups : Ok > 72: dlfilter C API : Ok > -73: Test dwarf unwind : Ok > +73: DWARF unwind : Ok > 74: build id cache operations : Ok > 75: daemon operations : Ok > 76: perf pipe recording and injection test : Ok > > not sure there's somebody out there parsing this output, > maybe we can find out ;-) Thanks, actually we have a parser on this output :-) I will correct the issue. Ian > jirka > > > > > Thanks, > > Ian > > > > > jirka > > > > > > > tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h | 14 +- > > > > tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/arch-tests.c | 47 +- > > > > tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/bp-modify.c | 2 +- > > > > tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/insn-x86.c | 2 +- > > > > tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/intel-cqm.c | 2 +- > > > > .../x86/tests/intel-pt-pkt-decoder-test.c | 2 +- > > > > tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c | 2 +- > > > > tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c | 2 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/api-io.c | 6 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/attr.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/backward-ring-buffer.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/bitmap.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/bp_account.c | 10 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 8 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/bp_signal_overflow.c | 8 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/bpf.c | 22 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 441 ++++-------------- > > > > tools/perf/tests/clang.c | 18 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/cpumap.c | 10 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/demangle-java-test.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/demangle-ocaml-test.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/dlfilter-test.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c | 10 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/dwarf-unwind.c | 2 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/event-times.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/event_update.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/evsel-roundtrip-name.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c | 6 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/expr.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/fdarray.c | 7 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/genelf.c | 6 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/hists_cumulate.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/hists_filter.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/hists_link.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/hists_output.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/is_printable_array.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/keep-tracking.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/kmod-path.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/llvm.c | 22 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/maps.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/mem.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/mem2node.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/mmap-thread-lookup.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-all-cpus.c | 5 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-tp-fields.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall.c | 5 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/parse-no-sample-id-all.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c | 6 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/perf-hooks.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/perf-time-to-tsc.c | 10 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/pfm.c | 16 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c | 19 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/pmu.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/python-use.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/sdt.c | 6 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/stat.c | 10 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/switch-tracking.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/task-exit.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/tests.h | 179 ++++--- > > > > tools/perf/tests/thread-map.c | 10 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/thread-maps-share.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/time-utils-test.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/topology.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/unit_number__scnprintf.c | 4 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/vmlinux-kallsyms.c | 5 +- > > > > tools/perf/tests/wp.c | 22 +- > > > > 81 files changed, 543 insertions(+), 618 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 2.33.0.464.g1972c5931b-goog > > > > > > > > > >