Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 10:40:45 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
To: Stephen Clark <Stephen.Clark@seclark.us>
cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, James Lockie <bjlockie@lockie.ca>,
       Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: escape key]
In-Reply-To: <45849497.7070206@seclark.us>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0612171037470.5411@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
References: <1166058290.2964.15.camel@monteirov> <20061213214140.df6111f5.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
 <4580E985.2090208@lockie.ca> <20061216084542.GD4049@ucw.cz>
 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0612161922530.30896@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> <45849497.7070206@seclark.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1313
Lines: 39


On Dec 16 2006 19:51, Stephen Clark wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> 
>> It's something between a misdesign and a misconfiguration of the ESC key.
>> 
>> In other words, many unices make ESC generate ^[, the general
>> terminal escape character that is _also_ generated by keys like "up",
>> ^[[A.
>> 
>
> do man ascii - ESC is 0x1b.
> Thats what the esc key should generate - it sometimes echoed as ^[ because the
> [ = 0x5b

Ok I hoped people would be smart enough to figure, but let me rephrase in two
ways:

  Many unices generate "\x1b" (^[) for ESC, which is also generated by
  keys like "up", which generates "\x1b[A" (^[[A)

>> MS-DOS, or rather QBASIC's, Turbo BASIC's and other implementation of
>> keys, does not have this "bug": here ESC generates "\x1B" and "up"
>> generates "\x00H" IIRC. There is no key defined to generate "\x00".
>> => All fits nicely.

  And QB generates "\x1b" (^[) while "up" generates "\x00H" (^@H).


Hope this makes things more clear - I interchangably used the ^ and the \
notation. Sorry if that confused anyone.

	-`J'
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/