Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <68ed78d0-4e72-cbb5-bfa8-d7a92ea7a377@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Sep 2021 22:17:51 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: mdio: fix memory leak
Content-Language: en-US
To:     andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
        davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, buytenh@marvell.com
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        syzbot+398e7dc692ddbbb4cfec@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
References: <20210927112017.19108-1-paskripkin@gmail.com>
From:   Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210927112017.19108-1-paskripkin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 9/27/21 14:20, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> Syzbot reported memory leak in MDIO bus interface, the problem was in
> wrong state logic.
> 
> MDIOBUS_ALLOCATED indicates 2 states:
> 	1. Bus is only allocated
> 	2. Bus allocated and __mdiobus_register() fails, but
> 	   device_register() was called
> 
> In case of device_register() has been called we should call put_device()
> to correctly free the memory allocated for this device, but mdiobus_free()
> was just calling kfree(dev) in case of MDIOBUS_ALLOCATED state
> 
> To avoid this behaviour we can add new intermediate state, which means,
> that we have called device_regiter(), but failed on any of the next steps.
> Clean up process for this state is the same as for MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED,
> but MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED name does not fit to the logic described above.
> 
> Fixes: 46abc02175b3 ("phylib: give mdio buses a device tree presence")
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+398e7dc692ddbbb4cfec@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>


I've just found, that this syzkaller bug has been closed by Yanfei's 
patch [1], but Yanfei's Reported-by: is wrong, IMO.

Yanfei's patch fixed other memory leak and it's not related to bug 
reported by syzkaller. If you take a look at log [2] you won't find 
error message about mii_bus registration failure, i.e the error happened 
a bit latter (more precisely in mdiobus_scan()).

Since, Yanfei's patch is already applied, we cannot remove this tag, so 
I am informing you about this situation to break possible confusions 
about 2 different patches with same Reported-by: tag :)


Thanks


[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210926045313.2267655-1-yanfei.xu@windriver.com/

[2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=CrashLog&x=131c754b300000


With regards,
Pavel Skripkin