Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 17:12:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 17:11:41 -0500 Received: from vasquez.zip.com.au ([203.12.97.41]:58128 "EHLO vasquez.zip.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 17:11:26 -0500 Message-ID: <3BF6E039.923E0577@zip.com.au> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:10:01 -0800 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.14-pre8 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Fedyk CC: Jamie Lokier , "Theodore Ts'o" , Brian , linux-kernel , Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: File server FS? In-Reply-To: <200111132203.fADM3jW03006@demai05.mw.mediaone.net> <20011113175348.B24864@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> <20011117181253.B5003@kushida.jlokier.co.uk>, <20011117181253.B5003@kushida.jlokier.co.uk> <20011117135542.H21354@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mike Fedyk wrote: > > I haven't actually resized any ext2/3 partitions. Didn't need to. I'll do > some tests though. I tested it a while back - it worked OK. If you could retest that'd be neat. The journal shouldn't be affected - it's just a regular file. mke2fs and tune2fs choose an initial journal size based on the size of the fs, so if you were increasing the fs size by a large ratio then there may be a case for increasing the journal size. But as you've pointed out, an 8, 16 or 32 megabyte journal covers an awful lot of metadata. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/