Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753836AbWLRLRg (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2006 06:17:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753835AbWLRLRg (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2006 06:17:36 -0500 Received: from nic.NetDirect.CA ([216.16.235.2]:51724 "EHLO rubicon.netdirect.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753836AbWLRLRf (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2006 06:17:35 -0500 X-Originating-Ip: 24.148.236.183 Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 06:09:59 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost.localdomain To: Jan Engelhardt cc: Steven Whitehouse , cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Caulfield , Chris Zubrzycki , Adrian Bunk , Randy Dunlap , Toralf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=F6rster?= , Aleksandr Koltsoff Subject: Re: [GFS2] Fix Kconfig [2/2] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1166435650.3752.1263.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> <1166435849.3752.1266.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.754, required 5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -15.00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 2.05) X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-From: rpjday@mindspring.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1046 Lines: 27 On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Dec 18 2006 09:57, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > config GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM > > tristate "GFS2 DLM locking module" > >- depends on GFS2_FS > >+ depends on GFS2_FS && NET && INET && (IPV6 || IPV6=n) > > What is this supposed to do? IPV6 || IPV6=n is a tautology AFAICS. no, we just went through that and russell king is correct -- see the brief series of posts from earlier this morning during which i made a fool of myself. :-P although, it *is* curious that there appear to be only four places in the entire source tree that incorporate that type of logical check. i'm still trying to wrap my head around the rationale for that particular combination, since it does seem to be rather infrequent and (at least for me) a little non-intuitive. rday - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/