Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 28 Sep 2021 18:28:23 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] PCI: ACPI: Get rid of struct pci_platform_pm_ops
 and clean up code
Message-ID: <20210928232823.GA748352@bhelgaas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1800633.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher>
Precedence: bulk

[+cc Ferry]

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 08:52:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> As explained in the changelog of patch [2/7], using struct pci_platform_pm_ops
> for ACPI is not particularly beneficial, so it is better to get rid of it and
> call the functions pointed to by it directly from the PCI core.
> 
> However, struct pci_platform_pm_ops is also used by the Intel MID support code,
> but it is actually better to call the MID PM function directly from the PCI
> core either, which is done in patch [1/7].
> 
> After these changes, patch [3/7] removes struct pci_platform_pm_ops and the
> rest is just cleanups and some code consolidation on top of that.

I like these a lot.  Not sure exactly where everything is after the
conversation with Ferry.  Let me know if I should be doing anything.