Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:06:38 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To:     Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>
Cc:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: st_lsm9ds0: Make use of the helper function
 dev_err_probe()
Message-ID: <20210929180638.6ddb313b@jic23-huawei>
In-Reply-To: <20210928014055.1431-2-caihuoqing@baidu.com>
References: <20210928014055.1431-1-caihuoqing@baidu.com>
        <20210928014055.1431-2-caihuoqing@baidu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:40:54 +0800
Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com> wrote:

> When possible use dev_err_probe help to properly deal with the
> PROBE_DEFER error, the benefit is that DEFER issue will be logged
> in the devices_deferred debugfs file.
> Using dev_err_probe() can reduce code size, and the error value
> gets printed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>

Hi Cai,

Picking a random patch to reply to...

Thanks for your hard work on these.  The ones I haven't replied to look
fine to me.   It might have been slightly better to slow down your initial
submission of these as then we could perhaps have avoided 2-3 versions
of every patch by identifying shared elements to improve in a smaller set.
Still that's the benefit of hindsight!

I'll not apply these quite yet so as to allow time for driver maintainers
and others to take a look.

If you could tidy up those few minor comments I have that would be great.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_core.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_core.c
> index b3a43a3b04ff..9fb06b7cde3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_core.c
> @@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ static int st_lsm9ds0_power_enable(struct device *dev, struct st_lsm9ds0 *lsm9ds
>  
>  	/* Regulators not mandatory, but if requested we should enable them. */
>  	lsm9ds0->vdd = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdd");
> -	if (IS_ERR(lsm9ds0->vdd)) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "unable to get Vdd supply\n");
> -		return PTR_ERR(lsm9ds0->vdd);
> -	}
> +	if (IS_ERR(lsm9ds0->vdd))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(lsm9ds0->vdd),
> +				     "unable to get Vdd supply\n");
> +
>  	ret = regulator_enable(lsm9ds0->vdd);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_warn(dev, "Failed to enable specified Vdd supply\n");
> @@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ static int st_lsm9ds0_power_enable(struct device *dev, struct st_lsm9ds0 *lsm9ds
>  
>  	lsm9ds0->vdd_io = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vddio");
>  	if (IS_ERR(lsm9ds0->vdd_io)) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "unable to get Vdd_IO supply\n");
>  		regulator_disable(lsm9ds0->vdd);
> -		return PTR_ERR(lsm9ds0->vdd_io);
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(lsm9ds0->vdd_io),
> +				     "unable to get Vdd_IO supply\n");
>  	}
>  	ret = regulator_enable(lsm9ds0->vdd_io);
>  	if (ret) {