Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] PCI: ACPI: Get rid of struct pci_platform_pm_ops
 and clean up code
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
References: <20210928232823.GA748352@bhelgaas>
From:   Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f6be0339-5b11-8c3b-ef5c-47e50e878e2d@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Sep 2021 19:14:43 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210928232823.GA748352@bhelgaas>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi

Op 29-09-2021 om 01:28 schreef Bjorn Helgaas:
> [+cc Ferry]
> 
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 08:52:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As explained in the changelog of patch [2/7], using struct pci_platform_pm_ops
>> for ACPI is not particularly beneficial, so it is better to get rid of it and
>> call the functions pointed to by it directly from the PCI core.
>>
>> However, struct pci_platform_pm_ops is also used by the Intel MID support code,
>> but it is actually better to call the MID PM function directly from the PCI
>> core either, which is done in patch [1/7].
>>
>> After these changes, patch [3/7] removes struct pci_platform_pm_ops and the
>> rest is just cleanups and some code consolidation on top of that.
> 
> I like these a lot.  Not sure exactly where everything is after the
> conversation with Ferry.  Let me know if I should be doing anything.
> 
I will happily retest likely on Sunday after I return from short holiday 
and report back here.